United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Gateron Jupiter Red vs. Keygeek Keygeek Raw

An in-depth look at the Gateron Jupiter Red and the Keygeek Keygeek Raw switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, two popular options to consider are the Gateron Jupiter Red and the Keygeek Keygeek Raw, both of which are linear switches. The Jupiter Red is known for its smooth and uninterrupted keystroke, thanks to its single-stage spring that provides a medium-heavy actuation. With high-precision molds and soft backlight effects, these switches are favored by those who appreciate a consistent typing experience. On the other hand, the Keygeek Raw stands out for its unique material blend, combining Nylon, UMPE, and Silicon to create a creamy yet lightweight switch. While arriving unlubricated, these switches offer a slightly textured feel out of the box, making them an excellent choice for enthusiasts who prefer to hand-lube their switches. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

N/A

Bottom-out force

60g

Bottom-out force

57.5g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

1.40 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.40 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

No

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Nylon & UPE blend

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

UMPE & Si blend

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Spring steel

Spring

22mm single-stage spring

Housing materials

The Gateron Jupiter Red and Keygeek Keygeek Raw both offer unique housing materials that provide different sound profiles and typing experiences. The Jupiter Red's polycarbonate top housing creates a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile, ideal for those who prefer a crisp typing experience. In contrast, the Keygeek Raw's Nylon & UPE blend top housing offers a different sound profile, exclusive to Keygeek Raw switches. While both materials provide a clear and resonant sound, the specific blend used by Keygeek Raw may offer a slightly different typing feel.

In terms of the bottom housing, the Jupiter Red's nylon material provides a deeper and fuller sound profile, thanks to its softer plastic composition. The Keygeek Raw's UMPE & Si blend bottom housing, on the other hand, offers a unique typing experience exclusive to this switch. The differences in sound profiles between the two bottom housing materials can significantly impact the overall typing experience for users who prefer a specific sound and feel when typing.

Overall, the choice between the Gateron Jupiter Red and Keygeek Keygeek Raw switches may come down to personal preference in terms of sound and typing experience. While both switches offer high-quality housing materials that enhance the overall sound profile, the unique blends used by each switch may cater to different preferences. Whether you prefer a sharper, crisper sound profile of polycarbonate or a deeper, fuller sound profile of nylon, both switches offer distinct qualities that can enhance your typing experience. Ultimately, regardless of the differences in housing materials, users can expect a high-quality typing experience from both switches.

Weight

Comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Gateron Jupiter Red linear switch and the Keygeek Keygeek Raw linear switch reveals some differences. The Gateron Jupiter Red has an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 60 grams, making it a medium weight switch. On the other hand, the Keygeek Raw has an unknown actuation force and a bottom out force of 57.5 grams, also falling into the medium weight category. The Jupiter Red is lighter in terms of actuation force, but heavier when it comes to bottom out force compared to the Keygeek Raw. Both switches provide a balanced typing experience suitable for extended periods of use, with the choice between them ultimately depending on personal preference for a lighter or heavier typing feel.

Travel distance

The Gateron Jupiter Red linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Keygeek Keygeek Raw linear switch has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.4 mm. In terms of travel distance, the Keygeek Raw offers a slightly shallower experience compared to the Jupiter Red. The difference may not be significant, but for those who prefer a shorter travel distance for quicker response times, the Keygeek Raw may be the better option. On the other hand, individuals who prefer a more substantial key press may find the 4 mm travel distance of the Jupiter Red to be more satisfying. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for travel distance and typing experience.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Keygeek Keygeek Raw has an MSRP of $5.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Keygeek Raw for $3.51.

The Gateron Jupiter Red comes in at $2.80 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, both the Gateron Jupiter Red and Keygeek Keygeek Raw linear switches fall into the category of neutral switches, offering a moderate actuation force requirement and a moderate sound profile suitable for various purposes. The sound output of a switch is also influenced by external factors such as the keyboard and keycaps being used.

When it comes to the feel of the switches, the Gateron Jupiter Red is described as polished, offering a smooth and refined typing experience with reduced friction and smooth key travel. On the other hand, the Keygeek Keygeek Raw switches are known for their textured feel, providing noticeable friction when pressed. This unique texture may appeal to users who prefer a slightly different tactile experience. Both switches also fall into the category of mild switches, offering a gentle typing experience that is approachable to most users.

Taking all available information into account, the Gateron Jupiter Red linear switch is best suited for those looking for a seamless and consistent typing experience with a medium-heavy actuation force. The Keygeek Keygeek Raw linear switch, on the other hand, stands out for its unique material blend and creamy yet lightweight feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to personal preference in terms of sound, feel, and typing experience. However, it's worth noting that both switches provide quality options for enthusiasts looking to customize and optimize their mechanical keyboards.

Conclusion

In closing, when deciding between the Gateron Jupiter Red linear switch and the Keygeek Keygeek Raw linear switch, it ultimately comes down to your personal preference and typing style. If you value a smooth, consistent keystroke with a medium-heavy actuation and softer backlight effects, the Gateron Jupiter Red would be a solid choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a slightly textured feel right out of the box and a unique material blend featuring Nylon, UMPE, and Silicon, the Keygeek Keygeek Raw may be more to your liking. Both switches offer a moderate sound profile and a medium actuation force, so rest assured that you're getting quality switches no matter which you choose. Consider your preferences in terms of feel and sound when making your decision, and you'll end up with a keyboard switch that enhances your typing experience.

Mentioned in this article