Outemu Lotus vs. HMX Xinhai
An in-depth look at the Outemu Lotus and the HMX Xinhai switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Outemu Lotus and the HMX Xinhai mechanical keyboard switches, it is important to note that the Lotus is best known for its [] characteristics, while the Xinhai is celebrated for its unique features. The Lotus falls under the category of [], offering a smooth linear typing experience. On the other hand, the Xinhai stands out with its innovative design, featuring a PA12 top housing for a softer acoustics profile and a POM stem for a distinctively crisp, higher-pitched resonance. The Xinhai is categorized as ['Bouncy', 'Clacky', 'Creamy'], providing users with a blend of subtle sophistication and precise performance. Both switches have their own strengths and qualities that may appeal to different users based on their preferences. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
35g
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
50g
Bottom-out force
45g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.30 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
pom
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the Outemu Lotus and the HMX Xinhai, it is evident that they both use nylon for the bottom housing. Nylon is known to elicit a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its relatively softer plastic composition that absorbs more sound. This results in a duller and rounder sound when typing on switches with nylon bottom housings. This similarity in housing material between the two switches suggests that users can expect a similar sound profile when bottoming out on keys, creating a consistent typing experience in that aspect.
However, when it comes to the top housing, the differences between the Lotus and Xinhai become apparent. The Lotus utilizes a nylon top housing, which contributes to a deeper sound profile similar to its bottom housing. On the other hand, the Xinhai features a polycarbonate top housing, which creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. Polycarbonate's stiffer plastic composition leads to a more clear and resonant sound profile, especially beneficial for switches with RGB lighting due to its translucency. This contrast in top housing material showcases how the choice of material can significantly impact the overall sound and feel of a keyboard switch.
Overall, while both the Outemu Lotus and the HMX Xinhai share the use of nylon for their bottom housing, the distinction in their top housing materials sets them apart in terms of sound profile. The Lotus provides a consistent, deep sound profile with nylon used in both top and bottom housings, while the Xinhai offers a combination of a deep feel from the nylon bottom housing and a sharp, crisp sound from the polycarbonate top housing. These differences highlight the importance of housing materials in determining the overall typing experience and sound characteristics of mechanical keyboard switches.
Weight
The Outemu Lotus linear switch has a lighter actuation force of 35 grams compared to the HMX Xinhai linear switch which has a slightly heavier actuation force of 37 grams. However, when it comes to the bottom out force, the Lotus requires 50 grams while the Xinhai only needs 45 grams. Both switches provide a lighter typing experience, making them suitable for longer typing sessions or gaming marathons. Those who prefer a more substantial typing feel may lean towards the Xinhai with its slightly higher actuation force. Overall, the actuation and bottom out forces of the switches play a crucial role in determining the typing experience and should be considered based on individual preferences.
Travel distance
The travel distance of the Outemu Lotus linear switch is 3.3 mm, while the HMX Xinhai linear switch has a slightly longer travel distance of 3.4 mm. Both switches fall within the range of shorter travel distances, making them ideal for gamers seeking faster response times. However, the Lotus offers a slightly shorter distance, which may appeal to those looking for a more responsive feel. On the other hand, the Xinhai's slightly longer travel distance may provide a bit more depth and feedback when typing. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for travel distance, with the Lotus offering a quicker feel and the Xinhai providing a touch more depth.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
For 10 switches, the Outemu Lotus comes in at $3.10, whereas the HMX Xinhai comes in at $3.50.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Outemu Lotus linear switch is known for being relatively quiet, providing a smooth and subtle typing experience without any loud or distracting noise. On the other hand, the HMX Xinhai linear switch is described as "clacky," producing a sharp and snappy sound when pressed that is crisp, bright, and percussive. Depending on personal preference, some users may prefer the quieter operation of the Lotus, while others may enjoy the distinct acoustic profile of the Xinhai for a more lively typing experience.
Moving on to the feel of the switches, the Outemu Lotus is known for providing a unique tactile sensation that is not further described in the information provided. In contrast, the HMX Xinhai offers a bouncy feel, giving users a spring-like feedback sensation that adds a sense of liveliness to each keystroke. Additionally, the Xinhai switch is described as creamy, offering a smooth and buttery typing experience that feels effortless and allows fingers to glide across the keys with ease. Depending on individual typing preferences, users may appreciate the bouncy and lively feel of the Xinhai, or they may prefer the more subtle tactile feedback of the Lotus.
In conclusion, the Outemu Lotus linear switch and the HMX Xinhai linear switch offer different subjective qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Lotus provides a quieter typing experience with a yet-to-be-specified tactile sensation, while the Xinhai offers a clacky sound profile and a bouncy, creamy feel. Depending on personal preferences for sound and typing sensation, users can choose between the two switches to tailor their mechanical keyboard experience to their liking. Ultimately, both switches are viable options that can deliver satisfying results based on individual preferences.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between the Outemu Lotus linear switch and the HMX Xinhai linear switch, consider your preference for the bottom out force. If you prefer a slightly lighter touch, the Xinhai with a bottom out force of 45 grams might be the better choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a slightly heavier touch, the Lotus with a bottom out force of 50 grams would be more suitable. Additionally, think about the sound and feel you prefer in a keyboard switch. If you enjoy a clacky sound and a bouncy feel, the Xinhai switch would be more to your liking. However, if you prefer a different sound profile or a creamy feel, the Lotus switch might be a better fit for you. Ultimately, the decision between these two switches will come down to your personal preferences in terms of typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
