Outemu Dustproof Red vs. KTT Pine
An in-depth look at the Outemu Dustproof Red and the KTT Pine switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, two popular options to consider are the Outemu Dustproof Red and the KTT Pine. The Dustproof Red is a linear switch that is best known for its durability and resistance to dust and debris. On the other hand, the KTT Pine is also a linear switch but stands out for its smooth and effortless typing experience, thanks to its factory-lubed finish. The Dustproof Red may be a more practical choice for those looking for a reliable and long-lasting switch, while the KTT Pine may appeal to those seeking a smoother and more enjoyable typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
60g
Bottom-out force
58g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
pom
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
15.5mm gold-plated spring
Housing materials
In comparing the Outemu Dustproof Red and the KTT Pine, we can see that both switches use polycarbonate for the top housing, which creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is because polycarbonate is a relatively stiffer plastic, leading to a more clear and resonant sound. Aesthetically, polycarbonate is also beneficial for RGB lighting due to its translucency. However, where they differ is in the bottom housing material. The Dustproof Red uses nylon for the bottom housing, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile, as nylon is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound. On the other hand, the Pine utilizes polycarbonate for the bottom housing, continuing the trend of a sharp and clear sound profile.
Despite the differences in bottom housing materials, both the Outemu Dustproof Red and the KTT Pine offer unique sound profiles due to their choice of housing materials. The split qualities between the top and bottom housings allow for a variety of tactile experiences while typing. The impact of the bottom housing is felt when pressing down on the switch, influencing the bottom-out sound and feel. On the other hand, the top housing plays a significant role in the sound when releasing a key. This balance of housing materials contributes to the overall typing experience and sound signature of each switch.
Overall, the Outemu Dustproof Red and the KTT Pine showcase the importance of housing materials in defining the sound profile of a mechanical switch. While both switches share the benefits of using polycarbonate for the top housing, they diverge in their choice of bottom housing material, resulting in distinct sound characteristics. Whether you prefer a sharper, crisper sound profile with the Dustproof Red's nylon bottom housing or a deeper, fuller sound with the Pine's polycarbonate bottom housing, each switch offers a unique typing experience that is tailored to individual preferences.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch and the KTT Pine linear switch, both switches have a similar actuation force of 45 grams. However, the Dustproof Red has a slightly higher bottom out force of 60 grams, while the Pine has a lower bottom out force of 58 grams. This means that the Dustproof Red switch is slightly heavier in terms of bottom out force compared to the Pine switch. The actuation force being the same means that both switches will provide a similar typing experience in terms of triggering keystrokes. The weight of the switches is important as it can affect typing comfort and endurance. Some users may prefer the lighter actuation force of the Pine switch for longer typing or gaming sessions, while others may prefer the slightly heavier bottom out force of the Dustproof Red switch for a more substantial typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for typing feel and force requirements.
Travel distance
The travel distance of the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch and the KTT Pine linear switch is the same at 4 mm. This means that when you press down on a key with either switch, you will experience a consistent travel distance of 4 mm. Both switches offer a similar typing experience in terms of how far the key travels when pressed. Whether you choose the Outemu Dustproof Red or the KTT Pine linear switch, you can expect to feel a travel distance of 4 mm, providing you with a consistent typing experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Pine has an MSRP of $4.60 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Pine for $4.15.
The Outemu Dustproof Red comes in at $3.10 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch does not have a specific sound descriptor provided, while the KTT Pine linear switch is characterized as having a bassy and low-pitched sound profile. The Dustproof Red's sound quality may be more neutral or moderate compared to the deeper and richer bass tones associated with the Pine switch. Sound preferences can vary among individuals, so choosing between these switches would depend on whether a user prefers a more subtle sound or a deeper, bass-heavy tone during key presses.
When it comes to feel, the Outemu Dustproof Red switch does not have a specific feel descriptor provided, while the KTT Pine switch is described as buttery and creamy. The buttery and creamy feel of the Pine switch suggests a smooth and fluid keystroke experience that provides a seamless and effortless typing sensation. In contrast, the feel of the Dustproof Red switch may offer a different tactile feedback or typing experience that is not explicitly mentioned. Users who enjoy a silky sensation and smooth keystrokes may lean towards the Pine switch for a more enjoyable typing experience.
In conclusion, the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch and KTT Pine linear switch offer distinct qualities in terms of sound and feel. While the Dustproof Red switch does not have specific sound or feel descriptors provided, the Pine switch is known for its bassy, low-pitched sound profile and buttery, creamy feel. Choosing between these switches would ultimately depend on individual preferences for sound, feel, and overall typing experience. Depending on personal preferences, users can expect different sound and feel experiences with each switch, but may achieve similar overall results in terms of performance and functionality.
Conclusion
To wrap up, when choosing between the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch and the KTT Pine linear switch, consider your preference for sound and feel. If you prefer a deeper, richer sound profile and a smooth, fluid keystroke experience, the KTT Pine switch may be the better option for you. On the other hand, if you value medium-bottom out force and are looking for a switch with a polished, factory-lubed finish for minimized friction, the Outemu Dustproof Red switch could be the right choice. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal typing preferences and the overall typing experience you are seeking.
Mentioned in this article
