Outemu Cold Plum vs. KTT Pine
An in-depth look at the Outemu Cold Plum and the KTT Pine switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Outemu Cold Plum linear switch to the KTT Pine linear switch, we find two distinct options catering to different preferences. The Cold Plum is praised for its thocky sound profile and fully nylon construction, offering a smooth keystroke and satisfying sound that appeals to typing enthusiasts seeking a unique experience. On the other hand, the Pine stands out with its medium-heavy feel, buttery smooth key travel, and factory-lubed finish that minimizes friction for effortless typing. While the Cold Plum is known for its distinct sound and feel, the Pine is lauded for its smoothness and effortless typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
60g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
70g
Bottom-out force
58g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
3.30 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
Nylon
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
15.5mm gold-plated spring
Housing materials
Overall, the Outemu Cold Plum and the KTT Pine have contrasting housing materials that result in distinct sound profiles. The Cold Plum's nylon top and bottom housing create a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer plastic that absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound. On the other hand, the Pine's polycarbonate top and bottom housing produce a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile because of its stiffer plastic, leading to a more clear and resonant sound. Therefore, users looking for a switch with a softer and fuller sound may prefer the Cold Plum, while those seeking a sharper and crisper sound may be more inclined towards the KTT Pine.
However, despite their differences, both switches share similarities in that they offer unique sound profiles based on their housing materials. The nylon housing of the Cold Plum and the polycarbonate housing of the Pine each contribute to the overall typing experience, with the bottom housing influencing the bottom-out sound and feel, while the top housing impacts the sound when releasing a key. This means that regardless of which switch is chosen, users can expect a distinctive typing experience based on the characteristics of the housing materials used.
In conclusion, the choice between the Outemu Cold Plum and the KTT Pine ultimately comes down to personal preference in sound profile. While the Cold Plum offers a deeper and duller sound due to its nylon housing, the Pine provides a sharper and crisper sound with its polycarbonate housing. Both switches excel in creating unique typing experiences, with the housing materials playing a significant role in shaping the overall sound profile of each switch. Whether one prefers a softer, fuller sound or a sharper, crisper sound, both the Cold Plum and the Pine deliver distinct typing experiences that cater to different preferences.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Outemu Cold Plum linear switch and the KTT Pine linear switch, it is clear that the Cold Plum is heavier while the Pine is lighter. The Cold Plum has an actuation force of 60 grams and a bottom out force of 70 grams, making it a medium-heavy switch. On the other hand, the Pine has an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 58 grams, placing it in the medium category. For those who prefer a lighter typing experience, the Pine switch would be more suitable as it requires less force to actuate and bottom out. Conversely, those who enjoy a more substantial typing feel may prefer the Cold Plum switch with its heavier actuation and bottom out forces. Both switches offer a different typing experience based on the weight of the force required, allowing users to choose based on their personal preferences.
Travel distance
The Outemu Cold Plum linear switch has a travel distance of 3.3 mm, making it shorter than the KTT Pine linear switch, which has a travel distance of 4 mm. The Cold Plum's shorter travel distance may appeal to gamers looking for faster response times, while the Pine's longer travel distance may provide a more satisfying depth when typing. Both switches offer unique benefits depending on individual preferences. If you are looking for a quicker and more responsive feel, the Cold Plum may be the better choice. On the other hand, if you prefer a more substantial key press, the Pine with its longer travel distance could be the right fit for you. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to personal preference and the type of typing or gaming experience you are looking for.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Pine has an MSRP of $4.60 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Pine for $4.15.
The Outemu Cold Plum comes in at $3.10 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Outemu Cold Plum switches are known for their thocky sound profile, providing a satisfying and distinct typing experience. On the other hand, the KTT Pine linear switches offer a bassy and low-pitched sound, creating a deeper and richer tone during key presses. Both switches offer unique sound characteristics that can enhance the overall typing experience, but the Cold Plum may provide a slightly more tactile and pronounced sound compared to the Pine.
When it comes to feel, the Outemu Cold Plum switches are known for their smooth keystroke and satisfying typing feel, providing enthusiasts with an enjoyable typing experience. In contrast, the KTT Pine linear switches are described as buttery and creamy, offering a smooth and fluid keystroke experience that minimizes friction for effortless key travel. Both switches prioritize providing a comfortable and seamless typing sensation, but the Pine may offer a more uniform and silky feel due to its factory-lubed finish.
Overall, both the Outemu Cold Plum and KTT Pine linear switches offer unique qualities in terms of sound and feel that can cater to different preferences among mechanical keyboard enthusiasts. While the Cold Plum excels in providing a thocky sound profile and smooth keystroke, the Pine stands out for its bassy sound and buttery typing experience. Ultimately, choosing between these switches will come down to personal preference in sound and feel, as both switches are designed to enhance the typing experience for enthusiasts seeking a distinct and satisfying feel.
Conclusion
Therefore, when deciding between the Outemu Cold Plum linear switch and the KTT Pine linear switch, consider the typing experience you are looking for. If you value a thocky sound profile and fully nylon construction that provides a unique and enjoyable typing feel, the Cold Plum may be the best choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a buttery smooth keystroke and a factory-lubed finish for effortless key travel, the Pine switch would be a great option. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences for sound and feel when typing on your mechanical keyboard. Choose the switch that aligns best with your typing style and preferences for a satisfying typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
