Cherry Nixie vs. Gateron North Pole V2
An in-depth look at the Cherry Nixie and the Gateron North Pole V2 switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When considering mechanical keyboard switches, the Cherry Nixie and Gateron North Pole V2 both offer unique characteristics that appeal to different preferences. The Cherry Nixie is renowned for its substantial heft and textured typing experience, thanks to the updated materials and springs from Cherry's MX2A update. On the other hand, the Gateron North Pole V2 is described as offering a gummy and creamy typing feel with a subdued sound profile. While the Nixie provides a low-pitched and thocky typing experience, the North Pole V2 offers a bouncy and polished feel. Each switch has its own strengths and appeal, making them suitable for various typing preferences. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
63.5g
Actuation force
50g
Bottom-out force
80g
Bottom-out force
65g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
Ink Housing Material
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Gold-plated
Spring
Gold-plated
Housing materials
The Cherry Nixie and the Gateron North Pole V2 both use different materials for their housing, with the Nixie utilizing nylon for both the top and bottom housing, while the North Pole V2 uses polycarbonate for both. In terms of sound profile, the Nixie's nylon housing provides a deeper and fuller sound due to its softer nature and ability to absorb more sound, creating a duller and rounder sound. On the other hand, the North Pole V2's polycarbonate housing creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound because of its stiffer composition, leading to a more clear and resonant sound profile.
However, when looking at the aesthetics of the switches, the choice of housing material becomes crucial. The Nixie's nylon housing may not allow for RGB lighting due to its opaque nature, while the North Pole V2's polycarbonate housing is translucent, making it ideal for showcasing RGB lighting effects. This shows how the choice of housing material can impact not only the sound profile but also the visual appeal of the switch. Both switches offer unique benefits in terms of sound and aesthetics, catering to different preferences and needs of keyboard enthusiasts.
Ultimately, the choice between the Cherry Nixie and the Gateron North Pole V2 will come down to personal preferences in sound profile and aesthetics. The Nixie's nylon housing provides a deeper and fuller sound, while the North Pole V2's polycarbonate housing offers a sharper and crisper sound. Whether you prioritize a softer, fuller sound or a clear, resonant sound, both switches have their own strengths. Additionally, considering the impact of housing material on RGB lighting, the clarity and translucency of the polycarbonate housing in the North Pole V2 may be more appealing to those looking to customize their keyboard with vibrant lighting effects.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Cherry Nixie linear switch and the Gateron North Pole V2 linear switch, it is evident that there are significant differences between the two. The Cherry Nixie has a heavier actuation force of 63.5 grams and a bottom out force of 80 grams, providing a more substantial typing experience. In contrast, the Gateron North Pole V2 has a lighter actuation force of 50 grams and a bottom out force of 65 grams, making it a medium-heavy option. Those who prefer a lighter typing experience may lean towards the Gateron North Pole V2, as it allows for longer typing sessions and is ideal for work or gaming. On the other hand, individuals seeking a more substantial push feel may opt for the Cherry Nixie for a heavier typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches comes down to personal preference in terms of actuation and bottom out forces.
Travel distance
Both the Cherry Nixie linear switch and the Gateron North Pole V2 linear switch have a travel distance of 4 mm, making them equal in this aspect. When comparing the travel distance of these switches, it is clear that they provide a similar experience in terms of key press depth. Users can expect a consistent feel and response from both switches due to their identical travel distances. Whether you choose the Cherry Nixie or the Gateron North Pole V2, you can rest assured that you will get a similar typing experience in terms of travel distance.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Cherry Nixie has an MSRP of $6.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Nixie for $4.15.
The Gateron North Pole V2 has an MSRP of $6.80 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the North Pole V2 for $5.70.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Cherry Nixie linear switch is known for its thocky and low-pitched sound profile, providing users with a deep and satisfying auditory experience. On the other hand, the Gateron North Pole V2 linear switch offers a more subdued sound, creating a dampened and subtle typing noise. Both switches have their unique sound characteristics, and choosing between them would depend on personal preference and the overall setup of the keyboard.
In terms of feel, the Cherry Nixie switch is praised for its textured typing experience, giving users a noticeable friction when pressing the keys. In contrast, the Gateron North Pole V2 switch is described as gummy, offering a unique sensation similar to bottoming out on a trampoline or a gummy bear. Additionally, the North Pole V2 switch has creamy, bouncy, and polished qualities, providing a smooth, springy, and refined typing experience. Depending on whether you prefer a textured or gummy feel, both switches offer different tactile feedback for users to enjoy.
Considering the subjective qualities of the Cherry Nixie linear switch and the Gateron North Pole V2 linear switch, both switches have distinct characteristics in terms of sound and feel. The Nixie provides a thocky, low-pitched sound profile with a textured typing experience, while the North Pole V2 offers a subdued sound with a gummy, creamy, bouncy, and polished typing feel. Ultimately, choosing between these switches would depend on personal preferences for sound, feel, and overall typing experience. Whether you opt for the Cherry Nixie or the Gateron North Pole V2, you can expect a high-quality linear switch that caters to different preferences and typing styles.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between Cherry Nixie linear switches and Gateron North Pole V2 linear switches, consider your preference for typing experience and sound profile. If you enjoy a heavier switch with a textured typing feel and a deep, thocky sound, the Cherry Nixie may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a medium-heavy switch with a gummy typing feel and a more subdued sound profile, the Gateron North Pole V2 could be a better fit. Ultimately, the decision comes down to personal preference and the specific typing experience you are looking for. Choose the switch that aligns best with your typing style and preferences for a satisfying keyboard experience.
Mentioned in this article
