United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT MoonRosa vs. Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile

An in-depth look at the KTT MoonRosa and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the KTT MoonRosa and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile offer distinct typing experiences. The MoonRosa linear switch boasts a buttery smooth feel and a low-pitched, mild typing experience, making it a popular choice for those who prefer a gentle keystroke. On the other hand, the WS Light Tactile switch provides a smooth yet tactile bump that is easy to feel while typing, with a neutral sound signature that is appealing to many users. Both switches are easy to press, but the MoonRosa is categorized as 'Mild' while the WS Light Tactile is labeled as 'Stepped'. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

37g

Actuation force

45g

Bottom-out force

45g

Bottom-out force

50g

Pre-travel

1.80 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

22mm spring

Spring

15.4mm single-staged spring

Housing materials

The housing materials of the KTT MoonRosa and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile both offer unique sound profiles, but differ in their material composition. The MoonRosa features POM top and bottom housings, creating a deeper and more muted sound profile. In contrast, the WS Light Tactile utilizes polycarbonate for the top housing, generating a sharper, higher-pitched sound. The nylon bottom housing of the WS Light Tactile provides a deeper and fuller sound, as it absorbs more sound compared to the stiffer POM material of the MoonRosa.

While the MoonRosa's POM housings offer a pleasing and unique sound, the WS Light Tactile's polycarbonate and nylon housings provide a contrasting experience. The translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for RGB lighting, enhancing the overall aesthetic of the switch. On the other hand, the softer nylon material in the WS Light Tactile's bottom housing creates a duller and rounder sound, emphasizing a deeper typing experience. Both switches offer an array of sound profiles, allowing users to choose based on their personal preference for sound and feel.

In terms of typing experience, the housing materials of both switches play a crucial role in the overall sound and feel of the keystrokes. The impact of the bottom housing is more pronounced when pressing down on the switch, influencing the bottom-out sound and feel. Conversely, the top housing contributes significantly to the sound when releasing a key, highlighting the importance of both materials in creating a balanced typing experience. Despite their differences, both the MoonRosa and the WS Light Tactile offer unique qualities that cater to individual preferences in sound and typing feel.

Weight

The actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT MoonRosa linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile tactile switch both fall within the lighter range of forces. The MoonRosa has a slightly lighter actuation force of 37 grams compared to the WS Light Tactile's 45 grams. Similarly, the MoonRosa also has a lighter bottom out force of 45 grams compared to the WS Light Tactile's 50 grams. Both switches offer a light typing experience, making them suitable for those who prefer a lighter touch when typing or gaming. The difference in actuation and bottom out forces between the two switches may be minimal, so users can expect similar results in terms of feel and feedback. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preference for a slightly lighter or heavier typing experience.

Travel distance

The KTT MoonRosa linear switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, making it slightly shorter than the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile switch, which has a travel distance of 4 mm. The MoonRosa's shorter travel distance may appeal to gamers looking for quick response times, while the WS Light Tactile's slightly longer travel distance may provide a more satisfying keystroke for users seeking more depth in their typing experience. Both switches offer a balance between the extremes of shallow and deep travel distances, providing a comfortable typing experience for a range of users. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches comes down to personal preference for travel distance and typing feel.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

For 10 switches, the KTT MoonRosa comes in at $4.88, whereas the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile comes in at $4.20.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the MoonRosa linear switch offers a low-pitched tone that provides a bass-heavy and mellow sound profile, which can be soothing to the ears. On the other hand, the WS Light Tactile tactile switch provides a neutral sound signature that is moderate in volume, making it suitable for various environments without being too intrusive. Both switches offer a pleasant typing experience without causing any distractions due to loud or high-pitched sounds.

In terms of feel, the MoonRosa linear switch provides a mild and easy-to-press typing experience, allowing for smooth and effortless key presses that reduce finger fatigue during extended typing sessions. The WS Light Tactile tactile switch, on the other hand, offers a stepped feel with a perceptible tactile bump that provides a bit more feedback during key presses compared to a linear switch. However, like the MoonRosa, it also maintains an easy-to-press actuation force, making typing comfortable and responsive for users.

Overall, both the KTT MoonRosa linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile tactile switch offer subjective qualities that cater to different preferences. The MoonRosa provides a buttery smooth typing experience with a low-pitched sound, perfect for those who prefer a gentle and quiet typing feel. On the other hand, the WS Light Tactile offers a more tactile typing experience with a neutral sound signature, making it a versatile choice for various typing environments. Whether you choose the MoonRosa for its mild and easy-to-press qualities or the WS Light Tactile for its stepped tactile feel, you can expect a satisfying typing experience with either switch. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches will come down to personal preference and typing style.

Conclusion

Ultimately, when deciding between the KTT MoonRosa linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile tactile switch, it all comes down to your preference in typing experience. If you prefer a buttery smooth typing experience with a low-pitched sound profile and easy-to-press keys, then the MoonRosa may be the switch for you. On the other hand, if you enjoy a snappy tactile bump with a neutral sound profile and easy-to-press keys, then the WS Light Tactile could be the better option. Consider the feel and sound characteristics that appeal to you the most when making your decision. Both switches offer light bottom out forces and neutral sound signatures, so it ultimately boils down to your personal preference for typing feel. Ultimately, the choice is yours based on what typing experience you value the most.

Mentioned in this article