United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT MoonRosa vs. HMX Swift

An in-depth look at the KTT MoonRosa and the HMX Swift switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When choosing between the KTT MoonRosa and the HMX Swift mechanical keyboard switches, it ultimately comes down to personal preference and typing style. The MoonRosa offers a buttery smooth typing experience with a neutral sound signature, making it ideal for those who prefer a mild, low-pitched, and easy-to-press switch. On the other hand, the HMX Swift stands out for its deeper sound profile and silky smoothness, thanks to its full nylon housings and delicate 42g actuation force. The Swift is categorized as clacky, easy-to-press, feathery, bouncy, and creamy, appealing to those who enjoy a more tactile and responsive typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

37g

Actuation force

42g

Bottom-out force

45g

Bottom-out force

50g

Pre-travel

1.80 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Total travel

3.90 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

Ly

Top housing material

POM

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

22mm spring

Spring

22mm extended spring

Housing materials

The KTT MoonRosa and the HMX Swift both feature unique housing materials that contribute to their sound profiles. The MoonRosa's POM top and bottom housings create a deep and muted sound profile, while the Swift's nylon top and bottom housings elicit a fuller and rounder sound. Both switches offer a pleasing sound experience, but the POM material of the MoonRosa provides a more subdued tone compared to the nylon material of the Swift. Despite these differences, both switches offer a unique typing experience that cater to different preferences.

The POM top housing of the MoonRosa and the nylon top housing of the Swift share similarities in creating a deeper sound profile. However, the POM material of the MoonRosa is noted for its muted sound, while the nylon material of the Swift is praised for its fuller sound. These variations in sound can impact the typing experience for users who prefer a quieter or more robust sound when typing. Additionally, the differences in material properties between POM and nylon may also affect the overall feel of the switch when pressed.

While the MoonRosa and the Swift both feature unique housing materials for their top and bottom components, the impact of these materials on sound and feel differs between the two switches. The bottom housing of a switch typically has a greater influence on the bottom-out sound and feel, while the top housing affects the sound when a key is released. This means that the POM bottom housing of the MoonRosa and the nylon bottom housing of the Swift will contribute different qualities to the typing experience, giving users a variety of options to choose from based on their preferences. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will come down to individual preferences for sound and feel while typing.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT MoonRosa linear switch and the HMX Swift linear switch, it is evident that both switches fall on the lighter side in terms of force requirements. The MoonRosa has a lower actuation force of 37 grams compared to the Swift's 42 grams, making it slightly lighter to trigger a keystroke. Additionally, the MoonRosa also has a lower bottom out force of 45 grams compared to the Swift's 50 grams, indicating a lighter overall typing experience when fully depressing the keys. Both switches provide a gentle typing feel, which is ideal for extended use without causing fatigue. Therefore, if you prefer a lightweight typing experience, either the MoonRosa or the Swift would be suitable options.

Travel distance

The travel distance of the KTT MoonRosa linear switch is 3.5 mm, while the HMX Swift linear switch has a travel distance of 3.9 mm. Both switches fall within the range of shorter travel distances, making them suitable for those who prefer quick and responsive key presses. However, the MoonRosa has a slightly shorter travel distance compared to the Swift, which may result in a slightly faster response time. On the other hand, the Swift offers a tad more depth to each keystroke, which some users may find more satisfying. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for travel distance and the desired typing experience.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The HMX Swift has an MSRP of $3.55 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Swift for $3.45.

The KTT MoonRosa comes in at $4.88 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When comparing the sound qualities of the KTT MoonRosa linear switch and the HMX Swift linear switch, we see a distinct contrast. The MoonRosa switch offers a low-pitched and mellow sound, providing a bass-heavy tone that contributes to a soothing typing experience. On the other hand, the HMX Swift switch produces a clacky and sharp sound, known for its crisp and bright characteristics. The sound profiles of these switches are influenced by factors like the keyboard's construction and keycaps used, so choosing the one that aligns with your preference is crucial for an optimal typing experience.

Moving on to the feel of the switches, both the MoonRosa and the Swift share similarities in being easy-to-press, offering gentle resistance during key presses for a comfortable typing experience with minimal finger fatigue. The MoonRosa switch is described as mild, providing a gentle typing experience that falls in a safe middle-ground zone, making it approachable for most users. Conversely, the HMX Swift switch is noted for its feathery and bouncy feel, offering light actuation force and spring-like feedback that adds a lively sensation to typing. Additionally, the Swift switch is described as creamy, providing a smooth and buttery typing experience that feels like effortlessly gliding across the keys.

In conclusion, while the MoonRosa and Swift linear switches differ in sound and feel, they both offer a pleasant typing experience with their own unique qualities. Choosing between these switches will depend on personal preferences regarding sound profile, typing feel, and overall usage. Whether you opt for the MoonRosa's low-pitched and mild characteristics or the Swift's clacky and feathery attributes, you can expect a satisfying typing experience with either switch. Ultimately, users will get similar results in terms of comfort and responsiveness with both switches, but the differences in sound and feel cater to individual preferences in the realm of mechanical keyboards.

Conclusion

To sum up, when deciding between the KTT MoonRosa linear switch and the HMX Swift linear switch, consider your preferences for typing experience. If you prioritize a buttery smooth and easy-to-press typing feel with a light actuation force, the MoonRosa switch is a great choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a deeper sound profile with a light actuation force and a feathery, bouncy feel, the HMX Swift switch may be the better option. Both switches offer their own unique characteristics, so ultimately, your decision should align with your individual typing preferences.

Mentioned in this article