KTT Matcha vs. Cherry Nixie
An in-depth look at the KTT Matcha and the Cherry Nixie switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
The KTT Matcha, a tactile switch, is highly regarded for its comfortable and snappy tactility, providing users with a satisfying typing experience. With a distinctly clean bottom-out sound thanks to its long pole stem, this switch is known for its unique characteristics such as being 'stepped', 'clacky' and 'feathery'. On the other hand, the Cherry Nixie, a linear switch, offers a textured typing experience with substantial heft, blending tradition with modern innovation through materials and springs from Cherry's recent MX2A update. Categorized as 'textured' and 'thocky', the Nixie provides a low-pitched sound profile. Each switch caters to different preferences and typing styles, so it ultimately depends on individual preference when choosing between the two. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
40g
Actuation force
63.5g
Bottom-out force
45g
Bottom-out force
80g
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Gold-plated spring
Spring
Gold-plated
Housing materials
The housing materials of the KTT Matcha and the Cherry Nixie switches differ significantly in terms of the materials used. The Matcha features a polycarbonate top and bottom housing, which results in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. On the other hand, the Nixie utilizes a nylon top and bottom housing, leading to a deeper and fuller sound profile. The stiffer nature of polycarbonate in the Matcha switch creates a clear and resonant sound, while the softer nylon in the Nixie switch absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound.
While both the Matcha and the Nixie switches offer unique sound profiles due to their housing materials, they also share similarities in terms of aesthetics and functionality. For instance, the polycarbonate top housing of the Matcha allows for RGB lighting to shine through due to its translucency, making it visually appealing. Similarly, the nylon bottom housing of the Nixie contributes to a deeper sound profile when typing, enhancing the overall user experience. Despite the differences in materials, both switches aim to provide a satisfying typing experience with distinct qualities brought about by their respective housing materials.
Overall, the choice between the Matcha and the Nixie switches may come down to personal preference in terms of sound profile and typing feel. The split between the top and bottom housing materials in these switches means that different aspects of the sound and feel are influenced by each part of the housing. Whether you prefer a sharper, crisper sound profile with the polycarbonate housing of the Matcha or a deeper, fuller sound profile with the nylon housing of the Nixie, both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different preferences. Ultimately, the decision between these switches will depend on individual preferences for sound, feel, and aesthetics.
Weight
In comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Matcha tactile switch and the Cherry Nixie linear switch, it is evident that the Matcha is lighter in both aspects while the Nixie is heavier. The Matcha has an actuation force of 40 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, providing a light and gentle typing experience. On the other hand, the Nixie requires a higher actuation force of 63.5 grams and a heavier bottom out force of 80 grams, resulting in a more substantial and pronounced keystroke. The difference in force between the two switches highlights the importance of weight considerations in keyboard preferences. Lighter switches like the Matcha are ideal for extended typing sessions or gaming, while the heavier Nixie switch offers a more forceful typing experience for those who prefer a stronger push feel. Overall, the actuation and bottom out forces of these switches play a significant role in determining the typing experience and level of tactile feedback that users can expect.
Travel distance
The KTT Matcha tactile switch and the Cherry Nixie linear switch both have a travel distance of 4 mm, making them equal in this aspect. When comparing the two switches, both offer the same amount of travel distance which can provide a consistent typing experience for users. This means that whether you choose the Matcha or the Nixie, you can expect similar results in terms of the distance the switch travels when pressed. Overall, both switches offer a standard travel distance, ensuring a comfortable typing experience for users.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Matcha has an MSRP of $5.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Matcha for $4.88.
The Cherry Nixie has an MSRP of $6.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Nixie for $4.15.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the KTT Matcha tactile switch is known for its clacky sound profile, providing a sharp and snappy auditory feedback when pressed. On the other hand, the Cherry Nixie linear switch offers a thocky and low-pitched sound, producing a deep and rich tone that is satisfying to many users. Depending on personal preference, individuals may gravitate towards the crispness of the Matcha or the deep thud of the Nixie, ultimately shaping their typing experience.
When it comes to the feel of the switches, the KTT Matcha offers a stepped, snappy, accented, feathery, and subtle tactile experience. This means that users can expect a switch with two stages of tactility, responsiveness, moderate tactile feedback, light keypresses, and a gentle resistance for comfortable extended typing sessions. Conversely, the Cherry Nixie is known for its textured typing experience, providing noticeable friction when pressed. This texture may appeal to users who prefer a more tactile sensation during typing sessions.
Overall, both switches offer unique qualities in terms of sound and feel that cater to different preferences among mechanical keyboard enthusiasts. While the KTT Matcha excels in providing a snappy and clean bottom-out sound with a comfortable typing experience, the Cherry Nixie stands out for its substantial heft and textured feel. Ultimately, the decision between these two switches will depend on the user's preferences in sound, feel, and typing style, with both switches offering distinct advantages that can enhance the overall typing experience.
Conclusion
In conclusion, when making a decision between the KTT Matcha tactile switch and the Cherry Nixie linear switch, consider your preferences for bottom out force, sound, and feel. If you prefer a lighter bottom out force and enjoy a snappy tactility with a clean bottom-out sound, the Matcha may be the better choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a heavier bottom out force and appreciate a substantial, textured typing experience with a deep and satisfying "thocky" sound, the Nixie would be more suitable. Ultimately, your decision should be based on what type of typing experience you find most enjoyable and comfortable.
Mentioned in this article
