United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Gazzew LT vs. Wuque Studio WS Jade

An in-depth look at the Gazzew LT and the Wuque Studio WS Jade switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When comparing the Gazzew LT linear switch to the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch, it is clear that both offer unique characteristics that cater to different preferences. The Gazzew LT is praised for its deep, resonant "thockiness" and seamless keystrokes, earning it the categories of 'Bassy', 'Thocky', and 'Low-pitched'. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Jade stands out for its bright metallic sound profile, creamy and smooth typing experience, and enchanting RGB display, earning it the categories of 'Clacky', 'Marbly', 'Resonant', 'Silky', and 'Creamy'. Each switch offers something different depending on whether you prefer a more bassy and thocky sound or a clacky and resonant typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

N/A

Actuation force

50g

Bottom-out force

65g

Bottom-out force

60g

Pre-travel

N/A

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.20 mm

Total travel

3.60 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

UPE

Top housing material

Proprietary Gazzew blend

Top housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Proprietary Gazzew blend

Bottom housing material

POM

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel Korean spring

Spring

18mm double-stage spring

Housing materials

The Gazzew LT and the Wuque Studio WS Jade both feature unique housing materials that contribute to their sound profiles. The LT utilizes a proprietary Gazzew blend for both the top and bottom housing, which is known for delivering a rich and deep sound due to its softness. In contrast, the WS Jade features a POM material for both the top and bottom housing, resulting in a pleasing and unique sound that leans towards the deeper and more muted side. Despite their differences, both switches offer a deep sound profile, but the LT may have a slightly softer and richer tone compared to the WS Jade.

The key difference between the housing materials of the Gazzew LT and the Wuque Studio WS Jade lies in their composition and resulting sound profiles. While the LT's Gazzew blend top and bottom housing provides a rich and deep sound profile, the WS Jade’s POM top and bottom housing create a more muted and deeper sound. However, both switches offer unique sound profiles that cater to different preferences. The LT may offer a softer and richer sound experience, while the WS Jade provides a more muted and deeper tone that some users may prefer for a quieter typing experience.

Overall, the housing materials of the Gazzew LT and the Wuque Studio WS Jade play a crucial role in defining their sound characteristics. The Gazzew blend top and bottom housing of the LT deliver a rich and deep sound profile, while the POM top and bottom housing of the WS Jade create a more muted and unique sound. Despite their differences, both switches offer distinct sound profiles that cater to different preferences. Whether you prefer the softer richness of the LT or the deeper muted tones of the WS Jade, both switches provide a unique typing experience based on their housing materials.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Gazzew LT linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch, it is evident that the LT requires no actuation force, while the WS Jade requires 50 grams. Both switches have a bottom out force of 65 grams and 60 grams, respectively. Therefore, the LT is lighter in terms of actuation force, but heavier when it comes to bottoming out, making it a good option for those who prefer a more substantial typing experience. On the other hand, the WS Jade is lighter in terms of actuation force but offers a slightly lighter bottom out force, which may be preferred by users who type for longer periods of time. Ultimately, both switches provide a different typing experience based on the force required, catering to different preferences of users.

Travel distance

The Gazzew LT linear switch has a travel distance of 3.2 mm, while the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch has a travel distance of 3.6 mm. In this case, the WS Jade has a longer travel distance compared to the LT. The shorter travel distance of the LT may be preferred by gamers looking for faster response times, while the longer travel distance of the WS Jade may appeal to those who prefer a more pronounced keystroke feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches depends on individual preferences for travel distance and typing experience.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

For 10 switches, the Gazzew LT comes in at $6.50, whereas the Wuque Studio WS Jade comes in at $4.30.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the Gazzew LT linear switch is best characterized by its bassy and thocky profile, providing a deep and rich auditory experience that resembles the satisfying thud of a well-crafted switch. In comparison, the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch offers a clacky and resonant sound profile, delivering sharp and bright tones with a clean and percussive quality. While the LT leans towards a lower-pitched bass tone, the WS Jade presents a higher-pitched and immersive sound profile, offering users a different auditory experience depending on their preference.

Moving on to the feel of the switches, the Gazzew LT linear switch's tactile experience is a bit of a mystery with no specific descriptors provided in the information. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch is described as silky and creamy, delivering an exceptionally smooth and buttery typing sensation that minimizes resistance and enhances overall typing comfort. This difference in feel may cater to individuals who prioritize smoothness in their typing experience or those who prefer a more muted tactile response.

In conclusion, the Gazzew LT and Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switches offer distinct sound and feel qualities that cater to different preferences among mechanical keyboard enthusiasts. While the Gazzew LT provides a bassy and thocky auditory experience with a seamless glide, the Wuque Studio WS Jade delivers a clacky and resonant sound profile paired with a silky and creamy typing feel. Whether you prefer a deeper, rich sound or a bright, percussive tone, each switch offers a unique typing experience that can be tailored to individual preferences. Ultimately, both switches provide high-quality performance that will satisfy newcomers to the world of mechanical keyboards.

Conclusion

To sum up, when deciding between the Gazzew LT linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch, consider your preferences for bottom out force, sound profile, and typing feel. If you prefer a slightly heavier actuation force at 65 grams and enjoy a deep and thocky sound profile, the LT may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter actuation force at 60 grams and enjoy a bright and resonant sound profile with a unique RGB display, the WS Jade may be more to your liking. Additionally, if you prefer a smoother and creamier typing experience, the WS Jade offers a silky sensation that is unmatched. Ultimately, carefully weigh these factors to determine which switch aligns best with your preferences and typing style. Happy typing!

Mentioned in this article