United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT Lightning vs. KTT Phalaenopsis

An in-depth look at the KTT Lightning and the KTT Phalaenopsis switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, the KTT Lightning and the KTT Phalaenopsis offer two distinct options to consider. The Lightning switches are known for their approachable "speed" characteristics, making them ideal for situations where milliseconds can determine success or failure. With a slick typing feel and a clacky sound profile, these switches provide a responsive and satisfying typing experience. On the other hand, the Phalaenopsis switches stand out with their beautiful translucent design and light actuation force of 37g. These switches prioritize comfort and minimize finger fatigue, even during extended typing sessions. Additionally, the 50g tactile force of the Phalaenopsis switches ensures a delightful and discernible tactile bump with each keystroke. Both switches have their own unique qualities, but let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities to help you determine the best switch for your specific needs.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

43g

Actuation force

37g

Bottom-out force

50g

Bottom-out force

50g

Pre-travel

1.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Polycarbonate

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

22mm gold-plated spring

Housing materials

The KTT Lightning and the KTT Phalaenopsis both utilize polycarbonate material in their top housings. This choice of material leads to a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile for both switches. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate is beneficial for those planning to use RGB lighting, as it allows for a visually pleasing illumination. Therefore, users can expect similar results in terms of sound and visual aesthetics from both the Lightning and the Phalaenopsis switches.

On the other hand, there is a distinction in the bottom housings of these switches. The Lightning features a nylon bottom housing, which offers a deeper and fuller sound profile when typing. Nylon, being a relatively softer plastic, absorbs more sound compared to harder plastics, resulting in a duller and rounder sound. In contrast, the Phalaenopsis incorporates a polycarbonate bottom housing, contributing to a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound. The bottom housing has more influence on the bottom-out sound and feel when pressing down on the switch.

In terms of overall performance, the choice of materials in the top and bottom housings of the Lightning and Phalaenopsis switches creates distinct sound profiles and tactile experiences. While both switches benefit from polycarbonate in their top housings, the differentiation lies in the bottom housings. The Lightning provides a deeper and fuller sound due to its nylon bottom housing, while the Phalaenopsis offers a sharper and crisper sound with its polycarbonate bottom housing. These differences cater to personal preferences in terms of typing sound and feel. However, both switches maintain the advantages of using polycarbonate in the top housing, enhancing clarity and resonance in sound.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Lightning linear switch and the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch, we can see some similarities and differences. Both switches have a bottom out force of 50 grams, providing a consistent and firm typing experience. However, the actuation force sets them apart. The Lightning switch requires a slightly heavier actuation force of 43 grams, while the Phalaenopsis switch has a lighter actuation force of 37 grams.

The lighter actuation force of the Phalaenopsis switch allows for a smoother and quicker keystroke initiation, ideal for those who prefer a lighter touch or engage in long typing sessions. On the other hand, the Lightning switch's higher actuation force provides a more substantial push feel, catering to individuals who seek a tactile and responsive typing experience. These individuals may appreciate the added resistance and feedback offered by the Lightning switch.

Considering weight, some users may lean towards the lighter option, as it enables extended typing without fatigue. This is especially advantageous for work environments or extended gaming sessions. However, those who prefer a more robust typing experience may opt for the heavier actuation force, allowing for a greater sense of key depression.

In summary, while both the KTT Lightning and Phalaenopsis switches share the same bottoming out force of 50 grams, their actuation forces differ. The Lightning switch requires a heavier actuation force of 43 grams, providing a substantial typing experience, while the Phalaenopsis switch has a lighter actuation force of 37 grams, offering a smoother and more responsive keystroke. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the user's preference for either a lighter or more forceful typing experience.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distance of the KTT Lightning linear switch and the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch, it is evident that they have different distances. The Lightning has a travel distance of 3 mm, which is shorter compared to the Phalaenopsis' 4 mm. The Lightning's shorter travel distance is favored by gamers who seek faster response times, as the shorter distance allows for quick keystrokes. On the other hand, the longer travel distance of the Phalaenopsis provides a more substantial and deeper feel when pressing down on a key, which some individuals may prefer. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches depends on personal preference and the desired level of responsiveness or depth.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The KTT Phalaenopsis has an MSRP of $4.73 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Phalaenopsis for $4.15.

The KTT Lightning comes in at $3.41 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

The KTT Lightning linear switch is best known for its approachability and speed, making it a popular choice for situations where split-second decisions can determine success or failure. When typing on the Lightning switch, users can expect a smooth and slick feel, accompanied by a clacky sound profile. The clacky sound produced by this switch is crisp, bright, and percussive, giving it a distinctive acoustic signature. Additionally, the Lightning switch has a high-pitched sound characteristic, which sets it apart from switches with a deeper and bassier profile. Overall, the Lightning switch offers a satisfying typing experience with its unique combination of speed, smoothness, and clackiness.

On the other hand, the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch is renowned for its beautiful translucent design and effortless typing experience. With an actuation force of 37g, this switch provides a light and effortless keystroke, minimizing finger fatigue even during prolonged typing sessions. The Phalaenopsis switch features a tactile bump with a tactile force of 50g, ensuring that each keystroke delivers a delightful tactile feedback. In terms of sound, the Phalaenopsis switch offers a bassy sound profile characterized by a deeper and richer tone. This gives each key press a satisfying "thocky" sound, resembling a deep thud or soft knock. Overall, the Phalaenopsis switch combines effortless typing with a pleasant tactile feel and a rich, bassy sound.

In summary, the KTT Lightning linear switch and the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch have distinct subjective qualities that cater to different preferences. The Lightning switch excels in providing a fast and responsive typing experience, with a slick feel and a clacky sound profile. On the other hand, the Phalaenopsis switch offers effortless typing with a light actuation force and a discernible tactile bump, accompanied by a bassy and thocky sound profile. Both switches deliver satisfying experiences in their own right, allowing users to choose the one that aligns with their preferred sound and feel. Whether you prioritize speed or comfort, both switches provide options that will deliver similar results.

Conclusion

To sum up, if you prioritize speed and responsiveness in your typing or gaming experience, the KTT Lightning linear switch would be the ideal choice for you. With its light bottom out force of 50 grams, it offers a slick typing feel and a clacky sound profile, making it perfect for situations where milliseconds can determine success or failure. On the other hand, if effortless typing and minimizing finger fatigue are your main concerns, the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch is the better option. Featuring a light actuation force of 37 grams and a satisfying tactile bump, these switches ensure each keystroke is a delightful and enjoyable experience. Additionally, the Phalaenopsis switches provide a bassy sound profile, which can be deep and rich, while the Lightning switches offer a clacky and high-pitched sound. In terms of feel, the Lightning switches provide a subtle and polished experience, while the Phalaenopsis switches offer a stepped tactile feel. Ultimately, the choice between these switches depends on your personal preferences and priorities for your keyboard usage.

Mentioned in this article