United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT Lightning vs. Outemu Dustproof Blue

An in-depth look at the KTT Lightning and the Outemu Dustproof Blue switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When comparing the KTT Lightning linear switch to the Outemu Dustproof Blue clicky switch, the former stands out as a popular choice for gamers seeking speed and precision due to its quick actuation and smooth keystrokes. In contrast, the Dustproof Blue switch offers a more tactile and auditory experience with its clicky sound profile, making it a favorite among typists who enjoy a satisfying clicking sound with each keystroke. Both switches have their own unique attributes that cater to different preferences and use cases; however, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

43g

Actuation force

50g

Bottom-out force

50g

Bottom-out force

65g

Pre-travel

1.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.20 mm

Total travel

3.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

Stainless steel

Housing materials

The housing materials of the KTT Lightning and the Outemu Dustproof Blue switches share similarities in their polycarbonate top housing. Both switches utilize polycarbonate, which results in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to the stiffness of the plastic. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches that incorporate RGB lighting, enhancing the overall aesthetic appeal of the keyboard. This common material choice in the top housing ensures that users can expect a similar sound experience regardless of which switch they choose.

However, the key point of differentiation between the two switches lies in their nylon bottom housings. The Lightning's nylon bottom housing produces a deeper and fuller sound profile, attributed to the softer nature of nylon that absorbs more sound compared to harder plastics. On the other hand, the Dustproof Blue's nylon bottom housing also offers a similar deep and full sound profile, thanks to the acoustic properties of nylon. While both switches share this common material in their bottom housing, the slight nuances in sound quality may be noticeable to discerning users.

Ultimately, the combination of housing materials in a switch plays a crucial role in determining the overall typing experience. While the top housing influences the sound when a key is released, the bottom housing has a greater impact on the sound and feel when a key is pressed. Therefore, users can expect variations in sound and tactile feedback based on the specific housing materials used in a switch. Whether it be the stiffer polycarbonate in the top housing or the softer nylon in the bottom housing, each material brings its own unique characteristics to the typing experience, allowing for customization based on individual preferences.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Lightning linear switch and the Outemu Dustproof Blue clicky switch, it is evident that the Lightning switch is lighter in both categories. The Lightning switch has an actuation force of 43 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, whereas the Dustproof Blue switch has an actuation force of 50 grams and a bottom out force of 65 grams. This makes the Lightning switch more suitable for those who prefer a lighter touch and may be ideal for extended typing sessions or gaming. In contrast, the Dustproof Blue switch provides a more substantial typing experience with its heavier forces, appealing to those who prefer a stronger push feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches would depend on individual preferences for actuation and bottom out forces, with the Lightning switch being the lighter option and the Dustproof Blue switch being the heavier option.

Travel distance

In comparing the travel distance of the KTT Lightning linear switch and the Outemu Dustproof Blue clicky switch, it is clear that the Lightning has a shorter travel distance of 3 mm compared to the Dustproof Blue's 4 mm. The traditional travel distance of 4 mm is seen with the Dustproof Blue, while the Lightning offers a shallower 3 mm distance. Gamers may prefer the Lightning for its faster response time due to the shorter travel distance, while those looking for a more profound keypress may lean towards the Dustproof Blue with its longer travel distance. Both switches have their advantages, with the Lightning providing quick responsiveness and the Dustproof Blue offering a more satisfying depth to the keypress. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences for travel distance.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

For 10 switches, the KTT Lightning comes in at $3.41, whereas the Outemu Dustproof Blue comes in at $3.10.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When considering sound, the KTT Lightning linear switch offers a clacky, high-pitched, and chirpy sound profile, providing a sharp and snappy typing experience that can be described as bright and percussive. On the other hand, the Outemu Dustproof Blue clicky switch lacks specific sound descriptors, indicating that its sound profile may not be as distinctive as the Lightning. It is important to note that the sound of a switch can also be influenced by factors such as the keyboard board and keycaps being used, so individual preferences may vary.

Moving on to feel, the KTT Lightning switch is noted for its subtle resistance and polished finish, resulting in a gentle yet refined typing experience. The smooth key travel and reduced friction provided by the Lightning switch contribute to a sleek typing feel that is suitable for shared spaces. Unfortunately, the Outemu Dustproof Blue switch lacks specific feel descriptors, leaving its tactile characteristics uncertain.

Overall, the KTT Lightning linear switch stands out for its speed-oriented design, clacky sound profile, and subtle typing feel, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a responsive and polished typing experience. While the Outemu Dustproof Blue clicky switch may offer a different typing experience due to its unknown sound and feel qualities, users can generally expect similar results to the Lightning if they prioritize speed and precision in their mechanical keyboard switch selection. Ultimately, the decision between these two switches will come down to individual preferences in sound, feel, and typing performance.

Conclusion

To sum up, when deciding between the KTT Lightning linear switch and the Outemu Dustproof Blue clicky switch, consider the type of experience you are looking for. If you prioritize speed and precision in gaming or typing, the Lightning switch with its light bottom out force of 50 grams is a great option. The clacky sound profile and slick feel make it ideal for fast-paced scenarios where every millisecond counts. On the other hand, if you enjoy a medium-heavy bottom out force of 65 grams and prefer a clicky typing experience, the Dustproof Blue switch might be more suitable for you. Ultimately, your choice should be based on your preferences for typing feel, sound profile, and the specific use case for your mechanical keyboard.

Mentioned in this article