KTT Kang White vs. Jerrzi Violet
An in-depth look at the KTT Kang White and the Jerrzi Violet switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the KTT Kang White linear switch to the Jerrzi Violet tactile switch, it's clear that both offer unique features for mechanical keyboard enthusiasts. The Kang White stands out for its smooth and dazzling typing experience, thanks to its self-lubricating material and low-pitched sound profile. On the other hand, the Jerrzi Violet switch is known for its gentle tactility and smooth actuation, providing a balanced and enjoyable typing experience with a neutral sound signature. While the Kang White offers a linear feel and sound, the Violet provides a tactile response for those who prefer a bit more feedback while typing. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
58g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.70 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
Both the KTT Kang White and Jerrzi Violet feature polycarbonate top housings that create a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is due to the relatively stiffer nature of polycarbonate, leading to a clear and resonant sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches with RGB lighting. However, while both switches share this common material for their top housings, the differences lie in their bottom housings. The Kang White utilizes a nylon bottom housing, which results in a deeper and fuller sound profile due to nylon's softer nature that absorbs more sound. Conversely, the Jerrzi Violet also incorporates a nylon bottom housing, which similarly provides a deeper and fuller sound but with a duller and rounder tone compared to the Kang White.
In terms of design and practicality, the choice of housing materials for the KTT Kang White and Jerrzi Violet plays a significant role in shaping the overall typing experience. The polycarbonate top housing in both switches contributes to a distinct sound profile characterized by sharpness and clarity, making them ideal for users seeking a more precise typing feel. However, the use of nylon for the bottom housing introduces subtle differences in sound quality – with the Kang White offering a deeper and fuller sound, while the Violet presents a duller and rounder tone. The contrasting bottom housings showcase how variations in material composition can affect the overall typing experience and sound output of mechanical keyboards.
While the KTT Kang White and Jerrzi Violet share similarities in their polycarbonate top housings, their choice of nylon for the bottom housings sets them apart in terms of sound characteristics. The Kang White's nylon bottom housing enhances the typing experience by producing a deeper and fuller sound, while the Jerrzi Violet's nylon bottom housing creates a duller and rounder tone. These differences highlight how the selection of housing materials can influence the overall sound profile and tactile feedback of mechanical switches. Ultimately, whether opting for the Kang White or Violet, users can expect a unique typing experience based on the specific combination of housing materials utilized in each switch.
Weight
The actuation force of the KTT Kang White linear switch and the Jerrzi Violet tactile switch is the same at 45 grams. However, the bottom out force of the Kang White is heavier at 58 grams compared to the Violet, which is unknown. This means that while both switches require the same amount of force to initiate a keystroke, the Kang White will provide a more substantial typing experience with a heavier bottom out force. For those who prefer a lighter touch for extended typing or gaming sessions, the Violet may be the better option. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches will come down to personal preference in terms of weight and feel.
Travel distance
The KTT Kang White linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Jerrzi Violet tactile switch has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.7 mm. Both switches fall within the traditional range of travel distances, with the Kang White being on the longer side and the Violet being on the shorter side. Gamers may prefer the shorter travel distance of the Violet for faster response times, while some users may appreciate the more substantial feel of the Kang White's longer travel distance. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for key feel and response time.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Jerrzi Violet has an MSRP of $2.79 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Violet for $2.30.
The KTT Kang White comes in at $1.99 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, both the KTT Kang White and Jerrzi Violet switches offer a neutral typing experience, suitable for various environments and users. The Kang White provides a low-pitched sound that is mellow and bass-heavy, while the Violet offers a similar neutral sound profile, creating a balanced and enjoyable auditory experience. Ultimately, the sound produced by these switches will also be influenced by factors such as the keyboard itself and the keycaps used.
Moving on to feel, the Kang White switch does not have a specific feel descriptor provided. On the other hand, the Jerrzi Violet switch is described as having a stepped tactile feel. This means that the Violet switch offers a more subtle tactile bump compared to other switches, providing users with a unique typing sensation that includes distinct pre-travel and post-travel stages.
In conclusion, both the KTT Kang White linear switch and Jerrzi Violet tactile switch offer their own unique qualities when it comes to sound and feel. While the Kang White provides a low-pitched typing sound and a smooth linear experience, the Violet switch offers a balanced neutral sound and a stepped tactile feel. Depending on your personal preference for sound and typing sensation, either of these switches can provide a satisfying typing experience. Ultimately, the decision between the Kang White and Violet switches will come down to individual preference in sound and feel.
Conclusion
To sum up, when deciding between the KTT Kang White linear switch and the Jerrzi Violet tactile switch, it ultimately comes down to personal preference and typing style. If you prefer a smooth and silky typing experience with a low-pitched sound profile, the Kang White might be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you enjoy a gentle tactile feedback with a neutral sound signature and a stepped feel, the Violet switch could be more to your liking. Consider your typing preferences and needs to determine which switch would best suit your typing style. Ultimately, both switches offer unique characteristics that can enhance your overall typing experience based on what you prioritize in a mechanical keyboard switch.
Mentioned in this article
