Aflion Iceberg vs. KTT Phalaenopsis
An in-depth look at the Aflion Iceberg and the KTT Phalaenopsis switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
Introducing the Aflion Iceberg and the KTT Phalaenopsis, two mechanical keyboard switches that offer unique experiences for keyboard enthusiasts. Aflion, a relatively new switch manufacturer, has gained attention for their exceptional quality switches, and the Iceberg is a prime example. This linear switch boasts a satisfying smoothness and a fulfilling feel, thanks to its two-stage spring. Categorized as 'Clacky,' 'High-pitched,' 'Snappy,' 'Feathery,' and 'Subtle,' the Iceberg offers a range of tactile feedback options to suit individual preferences. On the other hand, the KTT Phalaenopsis shines with its beautiful translucent appearance and light actuation force of 37g. Typing becomes effortless, and finger fatigue is minimized even during prolonged typing sessions. With a 50g tactile force, each keystroke provides a delightful experience with a discernible bump. Categorized as 'Bassy,' 'Stepped,' and 'Thocky,' the Phalaenopsis offers a different set of tactile feedback characteristics. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond these generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits your typing style and preferences.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
37g
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
45g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
20mm two-stage spring
Spring
22mm gold-plated spring
Housing materials
The Aflion Iceberg and the KTT Phalaenopsis both feature polycarbonate top housings, which provide similar benefits. The use of polycarbonate in the housing creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile, resulting in a more clear and resonant sound. Additionally, the translucent nature of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches that plan to use RGB lighting, as it allows for a visually appealing illumination. Therefore, both the Iceberg and the Phalaenopsis will offer a similar sound experience and aesthetic appeal due to their polycarbonate top housings.
However, the bottom housings of the Iceberg and the Phalaenopsis differ in materials, resulting in distinct sound profiles. The Iceberg utilizes a nylon bottom housing, which contributes to a deeper and fuller sound profile. Nylon is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound than harder plastics, resulting in a duller and rounder sound when typing on switches with nylon bottom housings. On the other hand, the Phalaenopsis incorporates a polycarbonate bottom housing, which maintains the sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile associated with the material. The differences in material between the two switches' bottom housings will impact the bottom-out sound and feel when pressing down on the switch.
Overall, while the top housings of the Iceberg and the Phalaenopsis are similar in material and provide comparable benefits, their bottom housings differ significantly in materials, resulting in distinct sound profiles. The Iceberg's nylon bottom housing leads to a deeper and fuller sound, while the Phalaenopsis's polycarbonate bottom housing contributes to a sharper and crisper sound. Therefore, users can expect a different typing experience between the two switches due to the variation in bottom housing materials.
Weight
When comparing and contrasting the actuation force and bottom out force of the Aflion Iceberg linear switch and the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch, we can see that both switches have the same actuation force of 37 grams. This means that the force required to trigger a keystroke is identical for both switches, ensuring a similar level of responsiveness.
However, when it comes to the bottom out force, there is a slight difference between the two switches. The Iceberg has a bottom out force of 45 grams, while the Phalaenopsis has a slightly heavier bottom out force of 50 grams. This means that the Phalaenopsis provides a slightly more substantial typing experience, requiring a slightly stronger push to fully press down a key.
Considering weight, some users might prefer the lighter actuation and bottom out forces of the Iceberg switch as it allows for longer periods of comfortable typing, making it a suitable option for work or extended gaming sessions. On the other hand, for those who enjoy a more significant push feel, the Phalaenopsis switch with its heavier bottom out force could provide a more satisfying and tactile typing experience.
In conclusion, both the Aflion Iceberg linear switch and the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch have the same actuation force, ensuring similar responsiveness. However, the Iceberg is lighter in terms of bottom out force, while the Phalaenopsis provides a slightly heavier and more substantial typing experience. The choice between the two switches ultimately depends on personal preference and the desired typing experience.
Travel distance
The travel distance of a switch is an important factor to consider when choosing a keyboard. In the case of the Aflion Iceberg linear switch and the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch, both switches have a travel distance of 4 mm. This means that when you press down on a key equipped with either of these switches, you will feel the same distance of travel. Therefore, in terms of travel distance, both switches provide similar results.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Aflion Iceberg has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Iceberg for $3.07.
The KTT Phalaenopsis has an MSRP of $4.73 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Phalaenopsis for $4.15.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The Aflion Iceberg linear switch is best known for its satisfying smoothness and fulfilling feel. This switch offers a clacky sound profile, producing a sharp and snappy sound when pressed. It has a high-pitched sound characteristic, which creates a crisp and bright sound experience. In terms of feel, the Iceberg switch is described as snappy, making it super responsive due to its longer or dual-staged springs. Additionally, it provides a subtle resistance, maintaining a light typing feel. The sound signature is not resonant, making it suitable for shared spaces. Overall, the Iceberg switch offers a smooth and satisfying typing experience with a clacky and high-pitched sound profile.
On the other hand, the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch is best known for its beautiful translucent appearance and effortless typing experience. It features a light actuation force of 37g, reducing finger fatigue during prolonged typing sessions. The Phalaenopsis switch provides a tactile bump with a tactile force of 50g, ensuring a satisfying and discernible feel with each keystroke. In terms of sound, the Phalaenopsis switch offers a bassy sound profile, characterized by a deeper and richer sound during key presses. It also produces a thocky sound, resembling a deep "thud" or a soft "knock" when the key is pressed and released. The KTT Phalaenopsis switch provides a tactile and delightful typing experience with a bassy and thocky sound profile.
Considering all the available information, the Aflion Iceberg and KTT Phalaenopsis switches offer distinct characteristics in terms of sound and feel. The Iceberg switch is known for its clacky and high-pitched sound profile, along with a snappy and subtle feel. On the other hand, the Phalaenopsis switch provides a bassy and thocky sound profile, accompanied by an effortless and tactile feel. Both switches offer their unique qualities, and depending on personal preferences, users can select the one that aligns with their desired typing experience. If a clacky and sharp sound with a smooth feel is preferable, the Iceberg switch would be a suitable choice. Alternatively, if a bassy and thocky sound with an effortless and tactile feel is desired, the Phalaenopsis switch would be an ideal option. In terms of overall typing experience, both switches offer a satisfying and delightful feel, providing an enjoyable typing experience for newcomers.
Conclusion
To sum up, if you are looking for a smooth and fulfilling typing experience, the Aflion Iceberg linear switch is a great choice. With a light bottom out force of 45 grams, it offers a snappy and feathery feel, reducing finger fatigue during extended typing sessions. The Iceberg also has a clacky and high-pitched sound profile, producing crisp and bright keystrokes.
On the other hand, if you prioritize effortless typing and a discernible tactile bump, the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch is a perfect fit. With a bottom out force of 50 grams, it provides a satisfying typing experience and minimizes finger fatigue. The Phalaenopsis has a bassy and thocky sound profile, giving your keystrokes a deep and rich tone.
Ultimately, the choice between the Iceberg and the Phalaenopsis depends on your personal preferences. If you prefer a linear switch with a smooth feel and clacky sound, go for the Iceberg. If you prefer a tactile switch with a discernible bump and bassy sound, the Phalaenopsis is the way to go. Whichever you choose, both switches offer high-quality performance and will enhance your typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
