United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Bsun Hutt vs. Jerrzi Seashell

An in-depth look at the Bsun Hutt and the Jerrzi Seashell switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Bsun Hutt and the Jerrzi Seashell offer distinct typing experiences that cater to different preferences. The Hutt switch is a tactile switch known for its medium-heavy spring and prominent tactile bump, providing a satisfying and enjoyable typing experience. On the other hand, the Seashell switch is a linear switch admired for its stunning purple hue and light, clacky feel, making long typing sessions comfortable and delightful. While the Hutt switch is praised for its snappy and sharp characteristics, the Seashell switch is loved for being easy-to-press and polished. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

40g

Actuation force

45g

Bottom-out force

49g

Bottom-out force

N/A

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

1.20 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Total travel

3.40 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

POK

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

20.5mm single-staged spring

Spring

Stainless steel

Housing materials

When comparing the housing materials of the Bsun Hutt and the Jerrzi Seashell, it is evident that they both utilize polycarbonate for their top housing. This leads to a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile in both switches. The translucency of polycarbonate is especially beneficial for RGB lighting applications, making it a popular choice for top housings across various switches. However, while the top housing material is the same, the differences lie in the bottom housing material. The Hutt utilizes nylon for its bottom housing, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to the Seashell's nylon bottom housing.

In terms of sound profile, the nylon bottom housing of the Bsun Hutt creates a duller and rounder sound due to its softer nature, while the Seashell's nylon bottom housing offers a similar effect. However, the impact of the bottom housing material on the overall sound when typing is more pronounced, as it affects the bottom-out sound and feel of the switch. On the other hand, the top housing material plays a greater role in the sound when releasing a key. This distinction highlights the importance of both top and bottom housing materials in influencing the overall typing experience and sound profile of a switch.

Overall, the Bsun Hutt and the Jerrzi Seashell share similarities in their choice of polycarbonate for the top housing, resulting in a clear, resonant sound profile. The differences lie in the bottom housing material, with the Hutt offering a deeper and fuller sound due to its nylon bottom housing. While both switches provide unique typing experiences based on their housing materials, understanding the impact of each material on the sound profile can help individuals choose the switch that best suits their preferences for typing sound and feel.

Weight

The Bsun Hutt tactile switch has a lighter actuation force of 40 grams compared to the Jerrzi Seashell linear switch's actuation force of 45 grams. This means that the Seashell requires slightly more force to trigger a keystroke. However, when it comes to bottom out force, the Hutt has a heavier force of 49 grams, while the Seashell's bottom out force is unknown. Overall, the Hutt switch provides a lighter typing experience in terms of actuation force but requires a heavier force to fully press down, offering a mix of light and heavy typing sensations. In contrast, the Seashell switch has a slightly heavier actuation force but lacks information on its bottom out force. Depending on personal preference, some users may prefer the lighter actuation force of the Hutt for longer typing sessions, while others may prefer the potentially heavier feel of the Seashell for a more substantial typing experience.

Travel distance

The Bsun Hutt tactile switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the Jerrzi Seashell linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm. Both of these switches fall into the category of shorter travel distances, with the Seashell being slightly shorter than the Hutt. Gamers may prefer these shorter travel distances for quicker response times, but some may find them too abrupt. The difference in travel distance between the two switches is minimal, so for most users, the results will be similar in terms of feel and responsiveness. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches will likely come down to personal preference for the slight variation in travel distance.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Bsun Hutt has an MSRP of $6.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Hutt for $5.39.

The Jerrzi Seashell has an MSRP of $2.79 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Seashell for $2.30.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the Bsun Hutt switch offers a resonant typing experience with a higher-pitched sound profile that provides an immersive auditory sensation. On the other hand, the Jerrzi Seashell switch produces a clacky and high-pitched sound that is sharp, crisp, and bright, giving it a distinct percussive quality. Both switches offer enjoyable sound profiles that cater to different preferences, with the Hutt being more resonant and the Seashell being clacky.

In terms of feel, the Bsun Hutt switch provides a snappy, invigorating, sharp, and accented typing experience with its medium-heavy spring and prominent tactile bump. These qualities offer a tactile feedback intensity that is not overwhelming but noticeable with each keypress. Conversely, the Jerrzi Seashell switch offers a feathery, easy-to-press, and polished feel, with a light actuation force that reduces finger fatigue during long typing sessions. These characteristics make the Seashell switch comfortable and effortless, enhancing the overall typing experience.

Overall, the Bsun Hutt and Jerrzi Seashell switches offer distinct but enjoyable typing experiences. The Hutt switch excels in providing a resonant sound profile and a tactile feel that is responsive and immersive. On the other hand, the Seashell switch stands out with its clacky sound and feathery, easy-to-press feel that prioritizes comfort and reduced finger fatigue. Depending on individual preferences for sound and feel, both switches offer unique qualities that cater to different typing styles and preferences, ensuring a delightful typing experience for any keyboard enthusiast.

Conclusion

In conclusion, when choosing between the Bsun Hutt tactile switch and the Jerrzi Seashell linear switch, consider your preferences for typing experience. If you enjoy a medium-heavy spring with a prominent tactile bump, along with a balanced sound profile, the Hutt switch could be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a light and clacky switch with a stunning purple hue that offers an enjoyable typing experience with reduced finger fatigue, the Seashell switch might be more suitable. Ultimately, your decision should be based on what type of typing sensation and sound profile you find most appealing.

Mentioned in this article