Bsun Hutt vs. KTT Peach
An in-depth look at the Bsun Hutt and the KTT Peach switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Bsun Hutt and the KTT Peach offer unique typing experiences that cater to different preferences. The Bsun Hutt is a tactile switch that boasts a medium-heavy spring and a prominent tactile bump, providing a snappy and invigorating typing sensation with a balanced sound profile. On the other hand, the KTT Peach is a linear switch known for its syrupy smooth typing experience and deep, thocky sound profile. While the Hutt switch is characterized as sharp and accented, the Peach switch is described as low-pitched and mild. Each switch has its own distinct qualities that may appeal to different users based on their typing preferences. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
40g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
49g
Bottom-out force
53g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POK
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
20.5mm single-staged spring
Spring
13mm progressive spring
Housing materials
The Bsun Hutt and the KTT Peach both feature polycarbonate top housings, which create a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is due to polycarbonate being a stiff plastic that enhances resonance. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches with RGB lighting. On the other hand, both switches have nylon bottom housings, which offer a deeper and fuller sound profile. Nylon's softer nature absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound when typing on these switches.
Despite the similarities in housing materials between the Bsun Hutt and the KTT Peach, the use of polycarbonate and nylon in different parts of the switches provides unique characteristics. The qualities of the bottom housing material are more prominent when pressing down on the switch, influencing the bottom-out sound and feel. Conversely, the top housing material has a greater impact on the sound produced when releasing a key. This distribution of materials allows for a balanced typing experience that combines the sharpness of polycarbonate with the depth of nylon in each keystroke.
In conclusion, while both the Bsun Hutt and the KTT Peach share the same housing materials, the combination of polycarbonate top housings and nylon bottom housings creates distinct sound profiles for each switch. The use of polycarbonate results in a sharper sound with enhanced resonance, particularly suitable for RGB lighting. In contrast, the nylon bottom housings deliver a deeper and fuller sound by absorbing more sound. The division of these materials in different parts of the switches ensures a nuanced typing experience that balances clarity and depth in each keystroke.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Bsun Hutt tactile switch and the KTT Peach linear switch, it is evident that the Hutt has a lighter touch compared to the Peach. The Hutt requires an actuation force of 40 grams and a bottom out force of 49 grams, making it ideal for those who prefer a lighter typing experience. In contrast, the Peach has a slightly heavier actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, providing a more substantial typing feel. Both switches offer a comfortable typing experience, but the Hutt is lighter and better suited for longer typing sessions, while the Peach provides a slightly more tactile and responsive feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on the user's preference for actuation force and bottom out force.
Travel distance
The Bsun Hutt tactile switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the KTT Peach linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm. In this case, the KTT Peach has a longer travel distance compared to the Bsun Hutt. The difference may not seem significant, but it can impact the overall feel and responsiveness of the switch. Gamers who prioritize faster response times may lean towards the Bsun Hutt with its shorter travel distance, while those who prefer a more substantial key press may opt for the KTT Peach. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and the specific use case for the keyboard.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Bsun Hutt has an MSRP of $6.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Hutt for $5.39.
The KTT Peach comes in at $2.91 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch offers a resonant typing experience with a clean and sharp sound profile, providing an immersive auditory experience for the user. On the other hand, the KTT Peach linear switch produces a low-pitched and thocky sound profile, with a more bass-heavy and mellow tone compared to the higher-pitched Hutt switch. The Peach switch also offers a neutral sound profile suitable for various typing environments. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches would depend on the user's preference for sound characteristics, whether they prefer a higher-pitched resonant sound or a low-pitched thocky sound.
When it comes to feel, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch is described as snappy, invigorating, sharp, and accented, offering a super responsive and immersive typing sensation with a prominent tactile bump that is neither overwhelming nor subtle. On the other hand, the KTT Peach linear switch provides a mild typing experience with a gentle feel that most users will find approachable and comfortable. The Hutt switch's pronounced feedback and firm actuation force cater to users looking for a more tactile typing experience, while the Peach switch's mild characteristics suit those who prefer a softer touch while typing.
In conclusion, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch and the KTT Peach linear switch offer distinct typing experiences in terms of sound and feel. The Hutt switch provides a resonant sound profile and a snappy, invigorating feel with a prominent tactile bump, while the Peach switch delivers a low-pitched thocky sound and a mild, gentle typing experience. Both switches have their unique qualities that cater to different preferences, so choosing between them would depend on whether the user prioritizes sound clarity and tactile feedback (Hutt) or a smoother, softer typing experience (Peach). Ultimately, users can expect satisfying results from either switch based on their individual preferences.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between the Bsun Hutt tactile switch and the KTT Peach linear switch, consider your preferences for typing experience. If you prefer a switch with a medium-heavy spring, prominent tactile bump, and a balanced sound profile, the Hutt may be the better choice for you. On the other hand, if you value a syrupy smooth typing experience, deep thocky sound profile, and a gentle typing experience, the Peach switch might be more suited to your preferences. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences for spring weight, tactile feedback, sound profile, and overall typing feel. Consider trying out both switches if possible to determine which one aligns best with your typing style and preferences.
Mentioned in this article
