Bsun Hutt vs. KTT Kang White
An in-depth look at the Bsun Hutt and the KTT Kang White switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing between mechanical keyboard switches, the Bsun Hutt and KTT Kang White offer distinct typing experiences. The Hutt switch stands out for its medium-heavy spring and prominent tactile bump, providing a satisfying and invigorating typing feel. On the other hand, the Kang White switch boasts a smooth and dazzling linear typing experience, thanks to its self-lubricating material. While the Hutt offers a sharp and resonant sound profile, the Kang White produces a low-pitched and neutral sound. Ultimately, the decision between these switches will come down to personal preferences in typing feel and sound. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
40g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
49g
Bottom-out force
58g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POK
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
20.5mm single-staged spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The Bsun Hutt and the KTT Kang White both feature polycarbonate top housing, which creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to its stiffness. This material is ideal for switches with clear housings, as it allows for RGB lighting to shine through. However, while both switches share this common feature, they differ in their bottom housing material. The Hutt boasts a nylon bottom housing, which produces a deeper and fuller sound profile by absorbing more sound than harder plastics. In contrast, the Kang White also utilizes a nylon bottom housing, offering a similar typing experience with a duller and rounder sound.
Despite their differences in bottom housing material, the Bsun Hutt and KTT Kang White both provide a unique typing experience that combines the qualities of their top and bottom housings. The bottom housing influences the bottom-out sound and feel of the switch, making the typing experience more tactile and satisfying. On the other hand, the top housing plays a crucial role in the sound produced when releasing a key, enhancing the overall sound profile of the switch. While the Bsun Hutt and the KTT Kang White may have different bottom housing materials, they both aim to provide a well-rounded typing experience that balances both sound and feel effectively.
In conclusion, the Bsun Hutt and the KTT Kang White showcase the importance of housing materials in determining the sound profile and feel of mechanical switches. Both switches utilize polycarbonate top housing for a sharper sound profile and clear aesthetics when using RGB lighting. Additionally, their nylon bottom housing materials contribute to a deeper and fuller sound profile, offering a tactile typing experience. While their bottom housing materials may be the same, the unique combination of top and bottom housings in each switch results in a distinct typing experience that caters to different preferences and needs of mechanical keyboard enthusiasts.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Bsun Hutt tactile switch and the KTT Kang White linear switch, it is evident that the Hutt has a lighter touch overall. The Hutt has an actuation force of 40 grams and a bottom out force of 49 grams, making it easier to type on for longer periods of time. In contrast, the Kang White has a slightly heavier actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 58 grams, providing a more substantial typing experience. Both switches offer a different typing feel, with the Hutt being lighter and the Kang White being slightly heavier. For users who prefer a softer touch, the Hutt would be the better option, while those who prefer a more pronounced typing feel may lean towards the Kang White. Ultimately, the actuation force and bottom out force play a significant role in determining the typing experience and overall preference for mechanical keyboard users.
Travel distance
The travel distance of the Bsun Hutt tactile switch is 3.5 mm, which is shorter than the 4 mm travel distance of the KTT Kang White linear switch. The Hutt offers a slightly quicker response time due to its shorter distance, making it a popular choice for gamers looking for fast feedback. On the other hand, the Kang White provides a bit more depth in the keystroke, which some users may prefer for a more substantial feel. Both switches offer different experiences based on their travel distances, with the Hutt being shorter and the Kang White being longer. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on personal preference and the desired typing experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Bsun Hutt has an MSRP of $6.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Hutt for $5.39.
The KTT Kang White comes in at $1.99 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch offers a resonant typing experience with a higher-pitched sound profile, providing a clean and sharp auditory feedback. On the other hand, the KTT Kang White linear switch produces a low-pitched and mellow tone, creating a more bass-heavy and neutral sound profile suitable for various typing preferences. It's important to note that the sound of a switch can also vary based on other factors such as the keyboard it is mounted on and the keycaps used.
Moving on to feel, the Bsun Hutt switch is characterized by its snappy and invigorating response, thanks to the medium-heavy spring and prominent tactile bump. This switch offers a sharp and accented tactile feedback, creating an immersive typing sensation that feels alive with each keypress. Unfortunately, information on the specific feel of the KTT Kang White linear switch is unavailable. However, with its self-lubricating material providing unparalleled smoothness, it can be inferred that the typing experience on this switch would offer a fluid and frictionless feel.
In conclusion, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch stands out for its distinct tactile feedback and resonant sound profile, creating a unique and enjoyable typing experience. On the other hand, the KTT Kang White linear switch offers a smooth typing experience with a low-pitched and neutral sound profile. While each switch has its own strengths, it's important to consider personal preferences and typing style when choosing between them. Ultimately, both switches provide quality performance, and selecting either would result in a satisfying typing experience.
Conclusion
To sum up, if you are looking for a tactile switch with a lighter bottom out force and a prominent tactile bump, the Bsun Hutt would be a great choice for you. It offers a snappy and invigorating typing experience with a resonant sound profile. On the other hand, if you prefer a linear switch with a slightly heavier bottom out force and a smooth typing experience, the KTT Kang White is the way to go. It provides a low-pitched and neutral sound profile, making it suitable for various usage scenarios. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preference for typing feel, sound profile, and actuation force.
Mentioned in this article
