KTT Glimp vs. Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile

An in-depth look at the KTT Glimp and the Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

Introducing the KTT Glimp, a linear switch, and the Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile, a tactile switch. If you're in search of the perfect balance between typing experience and resistance, the Glimp switch is the ideal choice. With its tactile feedback and comfortable actuation force, it offers a satisfying and responsive typing feel. Additionally, its fairly clacky sound profile adds an enjoyable auditory element to your typing sessions. On the other hand, the WS Heavy Tactile switches from Wuque Studio captivate users with a remarkable tactile bump and a satisfying resistance of 70g. Each keystroke becomes an engaging and immersive journey with these switches. Not only do they offer an exceptional tactile experience, but they also provide a captivating sound profile, thanks to Wuque Studios' nylon housings that produce a satisfying "thocky" resonance. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond these generalities so you can best decide on the perfect switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

43g

Actuation force

45g

Bottom-out force

53g

Bottom-out force

70g

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.20 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

18mm spring

Spring

22mm single-stage spring

Housing materials

The KTT Glimp and the Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile differ in their choice of housing materials. The Glimp features a polycarbonate top housing, while the WS Heavy Tactile utilizes a nylon top housing. The polycarbonate top housing of the Glimp offers a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is due to the stiffness of polycarbonate, which results in a clear and resonant sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it suitable for RGB lighting. In contrast, the nylon top housing of the WS Heavy Tactile produces a deeper and fuller sound profile. The softer nature of nylon absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound.

Moving on to the bottom housing, the Glimp employs a nylon bottom housing, while the WS Heavy Tactile also utilizes a nylon bottom housing. Both switches share this classic switch housing material, which contributes to a deeper and fuller sound profile. The relatively softer nature of nylon allows it to absorb more sound than harder plastics, resulting in a duller and rounder sound. Hence, whether it's the Glimp or the WS Heavy Tactile, the nylon bottom housing plays a significant role in shaping the overall sound and feel of the switch.

It is worth noting that when the top and bottom housings differ within a switch, the characteristics of each housing material will affect different aspects of the typing experience. The bottom housing, which directly impacts the bottom-out sound and feel, will be more influenced by the qualities of the bottom housing material. On the other hand, when releasing a key, the sound will be more influenced by the top housing material. Therefore, while the Glimp and the WS Heavy Tactile may have different housing materials, they both offer distinct qualities and contribute to the overall sound profile of the switches.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Glimp linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile tactile switch, there are some notable differences. The Glimp has an actuation force of 43 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, which falls in the medium-light category. On the other hand, the WS Heavy Tactile's actuation force is unknown, but it has a bottom out force of 45 grams, which is lighter than the Glimp.

For those who prefer a lighter typing experience, the WS Heavy Tactile would be the better option with its lower bottom out force. This allows for longer periods of typing without feeling fatigued, making it suitable for professional work or extended gaming sessions. However, for individuals who enjoy a more substantial and satisfying keystroke, the Glimp's higher bottom out force provides a stronger push feel during typing.

While the actuation force for the WS Heavy Tactile is unknown, if it happens to be close to the Glimp's 43 grams, then both switches would offer a similar level of responsiveness when triggering a keystroke. However, it is important to consider the difference in bottom out force, as this can greatly impact the overall typing experience. Ultimately, the lighter weight of the WS Heavy Tactile may be preferable for those seeking a smoother typing experience, while the Glimp's heavier bottom out force would appeal to individuals who desire a more tactile and pronounced keystroke feel.

Travel distance

The KTT Glimp linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile tactile switch has a travel distance of 3.2 mm. In terms of travel distance, the Glimp has a longer distance compared to the WS Heavy Tactile. The Glimp's 4 mm travel distance is considered more traditional, offering a deeper key press experience. On the other hand, the WS Heavy Tactile's 3.2 mm travel distance is slightly shallower, catering to those who prefer a shorter travel distance for quicker response times, especially favored by gamers. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches depends on personal preference - if you prefer a deeper and more substantial feel, the Glimp would be the better option, whereas if you prioritize a quicker and more responsive key press, the WS Heavy Tactile would be the preferred choice. Both switches provide distinct experiences, catering to different preferences in terms of travel distance.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The KTT Glimp has an MSRP of $3.84 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Glimp for $3.45.

The Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the WS Heavy Tactile for $3.25.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, both the KTT Glimp and the Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile switches share the descriptor of "clacky." This means that they produce a sharp and snappy sound when pressed, with a crisp and percussive quality. However, the WS Heavy Tactile also has the additional descriptors of "high-pitched" and "resonant." This means that it produces a sound with a higher pitch and a clean, sharp resonance. Ultimately, if you prefer a sound profile that is clacky and neutral, both switches will provide similar results. However, if you prefer a higher-pitched and more immersive auditory experience, the WS Heavy Tactile would be the better choice.

In terms of feel, the Glimp is described as "creamy" and "mild." This means that it offers a smooth and buttery typing experience with a silky sensation, as well as a more gentle overall feel. On the other hand, the WS Heavy Tactile has descriptors such as "accented," "bouncy," "invigorating," "sharp," and "snappy." This indicates that it provides a more pronounced tactile feedback with moderate to firm actuation force, a spring-like or elastic feedback sensation, and a snappy and reactive feel. It also has a strong and crisp tactile bump that can be felt distinctly with each keypress. If you prefer a mild and approachable typing experience, the Glimp would be a good choice. However, if you prefer a more prominent and invigorating tactile experience, the WS Heavy Tactile would be a better fit.

Considering all the available information, the KTT Glimp and the Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile switches offer different subjective qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Glimp provides a clacky sound profile and a creamy, mild typing experience, while the WS Heavy Tactile offers a clacky, high-pitched and resonant sound profile, along with an accented, bouncy, invigorating, sharp, and snappy feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on personal preferences. If you prefer a neutral sound and a mild feel, the Glimp would be a suitable option. Conversely, if you prefer a higher-pitched sound and a more pronounced and tactile feel, the WS Heavy Tactile would be a better choice.

Conclusion

Bringing it all together, if you are looking for a medium-light switch that strikes a balance between typing experience and resistance, the KTT Glimp linear switch is the perfect choice for you. With a bottom out force of 53 grams, it offers a satisfying and responsive typing feel with its tactile feedback and comfortable actuation force. Additionally, its clacky sound profile adds an enjoyable auditory element to your typing sessions. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter switch with a more pronounced tactile feedback and immersive typing experience, the Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile tactile switch is the way to go. With a bottom out force of 45 grams, it provides a satisfying resistance and a profound tactile bump. Furthermore, its nylon housing contributes to a "thocky" resonance, creating a satisfying auditory feedback. Ultimately, the choice between the KTT Glimp and the Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile depends on your preference for actuation force and tactile feedback, as well as the sound profile you find most enjoyable.

Mentioned in this article