United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

HMX EMO vs. HMX Jammy

An in-depth look at the HMX EMO and the HMX Jammy switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the HMX EMO and HMX Jammy both offer unique typing experiences. The EMO switch is characterized by its lively and clacky feel, paired with a feather-light 46g bottom-out force, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a bouncy and effortless typing experience. On the other hand, the Jammy switch has a softer feel with glittery nylon housings, providing a more muted yet deeply satisfying typing experience. While the EMO switch may appeal to those who prefer a more tactile and responsive feel, the Jammy switch is ideal for those looking for a quieter and smoother typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

40g

Actuation force

57g

Bottom-out force

46g

Bottom-out force

63g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Total travel

3.70 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

Ly

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

22mm single-stage spring

Spring

22mm single-staged spring

Housing materials

The HMX EMO and the HMX Jammy both feature different housing materials for their top and bottom housings. The EMO utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, which is known for creating a sharper and crisper sound profile due to its stiff nature. On the other hand, the Jammy incorporates a nylon top housing, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile thanks to the softer plastic's ability to absorb more sound. While the EMO's nylon bottom housing shares similar qualities with the Jammy's nylon top housing, such as creating a deeper sound profile, the split between the top and bottom housing materials affects the overall typing experience in different ways.

Despite the differences in housing materials between the HMX EMO and the HMX Jammy, both switches offer unique sound profiles based on their respective materials. The use of polycarbonate in the EMO's top housing results in a clearer and more resonant sound, particularly when combined with RGB lighting due to its translucency. In contrast, the Jammy's nylon top housing provides a deeper and fuller sound profile, emphasizing a rounder and duller tone that differs from the EMO's sharper pitch. Additionally, both switches feature nylon bottom housings that contribute to the overall typing experience, impacting the bottom-out sound and feel for users.

While the housing materials of the HMX EMO and the HMX Jammy offer distinct sound profiles, the qualities of each material ultimately affect the overall typing experience in unique ways. The split between the top and bottom housing materials allows for a variation in sound when pressing down on a key versus releasing it. The nylon bottom housing in both switches absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound profile, while the polycarbonate top housing emphasizes a sharper and crisper sound. Despite these differences, both switches ultimately provide users with a customizable typing experience based on their preferences for sound profile and tactile feedback.

Weight

The actuation force and bottom out force of the HMX EMO linear switch and the HMX Jammy linear switch show clear differences in weight. The EMO has a lighter actuation force of 40 grams and a bottom out force of 46 grams, while the Jammy has a heavier actuation force of 57 grams and a bottom out force of 63 grams. The EMO provides a lighter typing experience that may be preferred for longer typing sessions or gaming, while the Jammy offers a more substantial push feel that some users may find more satisfying. Both switches allow for a similar typing experience, but those looking for a lighter touch should go for the EMO, while those who prefer a heavier feel should opt for the Jammy. Ultimately, the weight of the actuation and bottom out forces will play a key role in determining which switch is the best fit for individual preferences.

Travel distance

The HMX EMO linear switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the HMX Jammy linear switch has a travel distance of 3.7 mm. This means that the Jammy has a slightly longer travel distance compared to the EMO. The EMO's 3.5 mm travel distance is ideal for those who prefer a slightly shallower key press, making it suitable for gamers looking for faster response times. On the other hand, the Jammy's 3.7 mm travel distance provides a bit more depth to the key press, which may be preferred by those who like a more substantial feel when typing or gaming. Both switches offer relatively short travel distances, making them both suitable for quick and responsive typing experiences. Overall, the choice between the two switches will ultimately come down to personal preference in terms of key press depth and responsiveness.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

In this case, both switches are $3.49. As such, price can't serve as a tiebreaker when choosing between the EMO and Jammy.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the HMX EMO linear switch is known for producing a lively and clacky sound, adding a satisfying auditory element to your typing experience. On the other hand, the HMX Jammy linear switch is described as having a more muted sound, offering a quieter typing experience that may be preferred by those in shared environments or who prefer a less pronounced noise level. Ultimately, the sound produced by either switch will also be influenced by factors such as the keyboard and keycaps used.

In terms of feel, the HMX EMO linear switch is praised for its feather-light 46g bottom-out force, providing a bouncy and effortless typing experience that is smooth and satisfying. In contrast, the HMX Jammy linear switch offers a medium-weight feel with a softer nylon housing, delivering a typing experience that is described as deeply satisfying. While the specific feel of each switch may vary based on personal preference and typing style, both switches are designed to offer a comfortable and enjoyable typing experience.

In conclusion, the HMX EMO linear switch and the HMX Jammy linear switch offer distinct qualities in terms of sound and feel that cater to different preferences. Whether you prefer a clacky and lively typing experience with the EMO switch or a more muted and deeply satisfying feel with the Jammy switch, both switches are designed to provide a smooth and enjoyable typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on your personal preference for sound, feel, and overall typing experience.

Conclusion

To sum up, when deciding between the HMX EMO linear switch and the HMX Jammy linear switch, it ultimately comes down to personal preference and typing style. If you prefer a lighter bottom out force and a bouncy, clacky typing experience, the EMO switch may be the better choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a medium bottom out force and a more muted, satisfying typing feel, the Jammy switch may be the right fit for your needs. Consider your sound preferences and desired typing feel when making your decision between these two switches. Ultimately, both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different typing preferences.

Mentioned in this article