United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Durock Daybreak vs. Jerrzi Poseidon

An in-depth look at the Durock Daybreak and the Jerrzi Poseidon switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When comparing the Durock Daybreak and the Jerrzi Poseidon mechanical keyboard switches, both linear switches offer a smooth typing experience without tactile feedback. The Durock Daybreak stands out with its solid 67g actuation force, providing a heftier touch favored by those who prefer a more substantial typing feel. Additionally, its quiet operation makes it ideal for environments where noise reduction is crucial. On the other hand, the Jerrzi Poseidon does not have a specific standout feature but provides a straightforward linear switch option. While the Daybreak is described as 'Polished', 'Muted', and 'Low-pitched', the Poseidon does not have specific categorizations. Each switch has its own unique characteristics that cater to different preferences. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

N/A

Actuation force

40g

Bottom-out force

67g

Bottom-out force

N/A

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

1.60 mm

Total travel

3.80 mm

Total travel

3.40 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

pom

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

POM

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Gold-plated spring

Spring

stainless steel

Housing materials

When comparing the housing materials of the Durock Daybreak and the Jerrzi Poseidon, it is clear that they both offer unique sound profiles. The Daybreak utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, which results in a sharper and crisper sound profile, ideal for those looking for a higher-pitched tone. On the other hand, the Poseidon's POM top housing creates a deeper and more muted sound, catering to individuals who prefer a more subdued auditory experience. Both materials offer distinct characteristics that can cater to different preferences in sound quality.

In terms of the bottom housing, the Daybreak features a nylon bottom housing, which is known for creating a deeper and fuller sound profile. This contrasts with the Poseidon's POM bottom housing, which also contributes to a deeper sound profile but in a more muted way. Both materials offer a different tactile experience when used in switches, with nylon being softer and absorbing more sound, while POM provides a unique and pleasing feel when typing. Overall, the bottom housing of each switch plays a significant role in the overall sound and feel of the typing experience.

While the housing materials of the Daybreak and Poseidon differ in terms of top and bottom housings, they both result in unique and desirable sound profiles. The use of polycarbonate in the Daybreak's top housing creates a clear and resonant sound, while the POM top housing of the Poseidon offers a deeper and more muted tone. Similarly, the nylon bottom housing of the Daybreak provides a fuller sound profile, contrasting with the POM bottom housing of the Poseidon, which also contributes to a deep and unique sound experience. In the end, both switches offer distinct sound characteristics that can cater to a variety of preferences among mechanical keyboard enthusiasts.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Durock Daybreak linear switch and the Jerrzi Poseidon linear switch, it is evident that there are some distinct differences. The Daybreak switch has an actuation force of None grams, meaning it requires no specific force to trigger a keystroke, while the Poseidon switch has an actuation force of 40 grams. In terms of bottom out force, the Daybreak switch requires 67 grams, which is considered medium-heavy, whereas the bottom out force of the Poseidon switch is unknown. The Daybreak switch is heavier in terms of bottom out force compared to the Poseidon switch, which could provide a more substantial typing experience for those who prefer a stronger push feel. Both switches offer unique benefits based on their weight, with the Daybreak switch being heavier and the Poseidon switch being lighter. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for actuation and bottom out forces.

Travel distance

The Durock Daybreak linear switch has a travel distance of 3.8mm, while the Jerrzi Poseidon linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4mm. The difference between the two is minimal, with the Daybreak being slightly longer in travel distance. Both switches fall within the range of shorter travel distances, making them ideal for those looking for a faster response time, such as gamers. The Daybreak's 3.8mm travel distance may provide a bit more depth compared to the Poseidon's 3.4mm, but ultimately, both switches offer a similar experience in terms of key press feedback. Whether you prefer a slightly shorter or longer travel distance will depend on personal preference and how you perceive key press depth.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Durock Daybreak has an MSRP of $6.87 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Daybreak for $5.41.

The Jerrzi Poseidon has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Poseidon for $3.59.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the Durock Daybreak linear switch offers a muted and low-pitched typing experience, making it ideal for quiet workspaces or environments where noise levels need to be kept to a minimum. On the other hand, information on the sound characteristics of the Jerrzi Poseidon linear switch is unavailable. Keep in mind that the sound produced by a switch can also be influenced by factors such as the keyboard's construction and the type of keycaps used.

Moving on to the feel of the switches, the Daybreak linear switch is known for its polished finish, resulting in smooth and refined key travel with reduced friction. This polished feel enhances the overall typing experience, providing users with a sleek and comfortable touch. Unfortunately, details regarding the feel of the Jerrzi Poseidon linear switch are not provided.

In conclusion, the Durock Daybreak linear switch offers a heavier actuation force of 67g, quiet operation, muted and low-pitched sound profile, and a polished feel for smooth key travel. While information on the Jerrzi Poseidon linear switch may be limited, it's worth noting that both switches may potentially provide a similar typing experience if they share certain characteristics such as being linear switches. Ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on individual preferences for typing feel, sound profile, and other subjective qualities that contribute to an enjoyable typing experience.

Conclusion

In summary, when deciding between the Durock Daybreak linear switch and the Jerrzi Poseidon linear switch, consider the level of typing force you prefer. If you enjoy a heavier touch and quieter operation, the Daybreak with its 67g bottom out force may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prioritize a switch with an undefined bottom out force and are looking for a unique typing experience, the Poseidon could be the one to go for. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preference for typing feel and sound.

Mentioned in this article