United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Gateron CJ vs. KTT Mallo

An in-depth look at the Gateron CJ and the KTT Mallo switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

In the world of mechanical keyboard switches, the Gateron CJ and KTT Mallo stand out as unique options with distinct characteristics. The Gateron CJ is a linear switch that offers a smooth and high-pitched typing experience, categorized as 'Chirpy', 'Neutral', and 'Thocky'. On the other hand, the KTT Mallo is a tactile switch known for its subtle tactility and medium-light typing feel, categorized as 'Feathery', 'Stepped', and 'Subdued'. While the CJ provides a more pronounced push feel and sound, the Mallo strikes a balance with its gentle feedback and neutral sound signature. Each switch has its own strengths and appeals to different preferences, but let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

50g

Actuation force

N/A

Bottom-out force

60g

Bottom-out force

55g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

No

Factory lubed

No

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Proprietary INK blend

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Gold-plated

Spring

Stainless steel

Housing materials

The Gateron CJ and KTT Mallo both offer unique housing materials for their switches. The CJ features a proprietary INK blend top housing, known for its satisfying thin and higher-pitched sound profile, while the Mallo uses a polycarbonate top housing, which creates a sharper and crisper sound. Both materials offer distinct auditory experiences, with the INK blend providing a more clacky sound compared to the polycarbonate's high-pitched resonance. However, users can expect a similar level of clarity and precision in sound production with either switch due to the high-quality materials used in their construction.

Moving on to the bottom housings, the CJ utilizes a POM material that produces a deeper and more muted sound profile, while the Mallo features a nylon bottom housing known for creating a fuller and rounder sound. The POM material in the CJ offers a unique typing experience with a focus on deeper tones, whereas the nylon in the Mallo absorbs more sound and produces a duller yet fuller sound profile. Users can choose between the two based on their preference for either a more muted and deep sound or a fuller and rounder typing experience.

In terms of overall sound and feel, the housing materials of the Gateron CJ and KTT Mallo have distinctive impacts on the user experience. While the bottom housing primarily affects the bottom-out sound and feel of the switch, the top housing plays a larger role in the sound when releasing a key. Both switches provide a range of auditory experiences, from the clacky and high-pitched sounds of the CJ to the sharp and crisp tones of the Mallo. Ultimately, users can enjoy a high level of quality and precision in sound production from both switches, making them excellent choices for those seeking unique typing experiences.

Weight

When comparing the Gateron CJ linear switch and the KTT Mallo tactile switch, it is evident that both have medium actuation forces, with the CJ requiring 50 grams and the Mallo having an unknown force. However, the CJ has a heavier bottom out force of 60 grams compared to the Mallo's lighter 55 grams. The CJ switch would be preferred by those looking for a more substantial typing experience due to its heavier bottom out force, while the Mallo would be suitable for those who prefer a lighter key press for longer typing or gaming sessions. Both switches provide a different typing feel due to their varying actuation and bottom out forces, but ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on the user's preference for a lighter or heavier typing experience.

Travel distance

Both the Gateron CJ linear switch and the KTT Mallo tactile switch have a travel distance of 4 mm, making them equal in this aspect. This means that when pressing down on a key with either switch, you will experience the same amount of travel distance from the top to the bottom. This similarity in travel distance may result in a similar typing experience for users of both switches. Overall, the travel distance of both switches is the same, providing consistent and predictable feedback for typists.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Gateron CJ has an MSRP of $6.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the CJ for $5.35.

The KTT Mallo has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Mallo for $4.40.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the Gateron CJ linear switch offers a unique and chirpy sound with a higher-pitched clack, setting it apart from other linear switches. On the other hand, the KTT Mallo tactile switch provides a more neutral and subdued sound, making it suitable for various environments where a quieter typing experience is desired. Both switches fall within a moderate to neutral sound profile, which means they are versatile choices depending on personal preference and typing environment. Ultimately, your choice of keyboard and keycaps will also influence the sound produced by these switches.

Moving on to feel, the Gateron CJ linear switch is described as providing a mild typing experience that falls in a safe middle-ground zone, making it approachable to most users. In contrast, the KTT Mallo tactile switch offers a feathery and light typing feel, reducing finger fatigue and making it comfortable for extended typing sessions. Additionally, the Mallo switch provides a subtle tactile feedback that is noticeable without being overpowering, striking a balanced chord for typists who prefer a gentler tactile experience. Both switches offer a comfortable typing experience, but the Mallo switch may be more suitable for those who prefer a lighter actuation force and subtle tactility.

Overall, the Gateron CJ linear switch and the KTT Mallo tactile switch each bring their unique qualities to the table. The CJ offers a chirpy sound and mild typing experience, while the Mallo provides a neutral sound signature and feathery feel. Depending on your preference for sound and typing feel, either switch could be a great choice for your mechanical keyboard setup. Keep in mind that personal preference plays a significant role in selecting the right switch for you, so consider trying out both switches if possible to determine which one best suits your typing style and preferences.

Conclusion

In closing, when it comes to choosing between the Gateron CJ linear switch and the KTT Mallo tactile switch, you should consider the type of typing experience you prefer. If you enjoy a unique and smooth linear switch with a medium bottom out force, the CJ may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a tactile switch with a gentle tactility and a slightly lighter bottom out force, the Mallo could be more suitable. Additionally, if you prefer a keyboard switch with a chirpy and higher-pitched sound profile, the CJ may be more to your liking. However, if you prefer a neutral and more subdued sound, the Mallo could be a better fit. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences for typing feel and sound.

Mentioned in this article