KTT Cabbage Tofu vs. Bsun Hutt
An in-depth look at the KTT Cabbage Tofu and the Bsun Hutt switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the KTT Cabbage Tofu linear switch to the Bsun Hutt tactile switch, it is clear that they each offer distinct advantages that cater to different preferences. The Cabbage Tofu provides a responsive typing experience with a swift rebound after actuation, making it ideal for users who value speed and efficiency. On the other hand, the Bsun Hutt offers a tactile bump and balanced sound profile, creating a more enjoyable and distinctive typing sensation for those who appreciate feedback and sound. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
40g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
49g
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POK
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm spring
Spring
20.5mm single-staged spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the KTT Cabbage Tofu and the Bsun Hutt are quite similar in terms of their top housing, as they both utilize polycarbonate. This material creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to its stiffness, making it ideal for switches that aim for clear and resonant sound. Additionally, its translucency allows for the use of RGB lighting, enhancing the overall aesthetic of the switch. This commonality ensures that both switches will deliver a similar sound experience and visual appeal when it comes to their top housing.
However, when it comes to the bottom housing, the Cabbage Tofu and the Bsun Hutt differ in their choice of material. The Cabbage Tofu uses a nylon bottom housing, known for producing a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer nature that absorbs more sound. On the other hand, the Hutt also opts for a nylon bottom housing, which similarly contributes to a rounder and duller sound experience. Despite this slight difference, both switches benefit from the acoustic properties of nylon in their bottom housing, ensuring a satisfying typing experience with a unique sound signature.
Overall, the choice of housing materials for the Cabbage Tofu and the Bsun Hutt showcases the importance of material selection in creating distinct sound profiles for mechanical switches. While they share a common polycarbonate top housing for clear and resonant sound, the use of nylon in the bottom housing introduces variations in the depth and texture of the sound. Whether one prefers a sharper sound profile with the Cabbage Tofu or a deeper sound experience with the Bsun Hutt, both switches offer a unique typing experience based on their housing materials.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Cabbage Tofu linear switch and the Bsun Hutt tactile switch, it is evident that the Cabbage Tofu is slightly heavier in both categories. The Cabbage Tofu has an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, while the Hutt has an actuation force of 40 grams and a bottom out force of 49 grams. This makes the Hutt a lighter option overall. The actuation force determines the force required to trigger a keystroke, while the bottom out force measures the pressure needed to press all the way down on the switch. Those who prefer a lighter typing experience may lean towards the Hutt for longer typing sessions, while those who enjoy a more substantial push feel may opt for the Cabbage Tofu.
Travel distance
In comparing the travel distance of the KTT Cabbage Tofu linear switch and the Bsun Hutt tactile switch, it is clear that the Cabbage Tofu has a longer travel distance of 4 mm compared to the Hutt's 3.5 mm. The traditional travel distance is 4.0 mm, making the Cabbage Tofu more in line with that standard, while the Hutt falls slightly below at 3.5 mm. Gamers may prefer the shorter travel distance of the Hutt for faster response times, while those looking for a more substantial key press may lean towards the Cabbage Tofu. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches will depend on individual preference for travel distance and desired key feel.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Cabbage Tofu has an MSRP of $3.25 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Cabbage Tofu for $2.75.
The Bsun Hutt has an MSRP of $6.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Hutt for $5.39.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the KTT Cabbage Tofu linear switch offers a clacky and high-pitched sound profile, resembling the collision of Mahjong tiles. On the other hand, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch provides a resonant sound profile, characterized by a clean and sharp higher-pitched sound. Both switches offer unique auditory experiences, with the Cabbage Tofu leaning towards a sharp and snappy tone, while the Hutt switch delivers a more immersive sound.
Moving on to feel, the KTT Cabbage Tofu linear switch is described as creamy, polished, silky, and snappy, offering a smooth and responsive typing experience with minimal resistance. In contrast, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch is noted for its snappy and invigorating feel, providing pronounced feedback, a sharp tactile bump, and a moderate to firm actuation force. Both switches excel in responsiveness and tactile feedback, catering to typists who enjoy a lively and engaging typing sensation.
In conclusion, while the KTT Cabbage Tofu linear switch and the Bsun Hutt tactile switch differ in terms of sound and feel, they both offer high-quality performance and a satisfying typing experience. Depending on personal preferences regarding sound profiles and tactile feedback, users can choose between the sharp and snappy feel of the Cabbage Tofu or the firm and invigorating sensation of the Hutt switch. Rest assured, both switches will provide a reliable and enjoyable typing experience, ensuring that newcomers to the mechanical keyboard scene can find a switch that suits their individual preferences and typing style.
Conclusion
In summary, when choosing between the KTT Cabbage Tofu linear switch and the Bsun Hutt tactile switch, consider your preferences for typing experience. If you prefer a light bottom out force and a swift rebound after actuation, along with a clacky and high-pitched sound profile, the Cabbage Tofu may be the better option for you. On the other hand, if you enjoy a distinctive tactile bump, medium-heavy spring, and a resonant sound profile, along with switches that are snappy, invigorating, sharp, and accented, then the Bsun Hutt would be a more suitable choice. Ultimately, both switches offer unique characteristics, so choose based on your desired typing feel and sound profile.
Mentioned in this article
