Gateron Box CJ vs. Cherry Nixie
An in-depth look at the Gateron Box CJ and the Cherry Nixie switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing between mechanical keyboard switches, the Gateron Box CJ and Cherry Nixie both offer unique features that cater to different preferences. The Gateron Box CJ is a linear switch that combines the swift characteristics of speed switches with the hallmark attributes of the CJ lineage, providing typists with rapid response and higher-pitched clacks. Its smooth push feel is described as impossibly smooth, offering a satisfying typing experience. On the other hand, the Cherry Nixie is a linear switch known for its substantial heft and textured typing experience, incorporating updated materials and springs for a blend of tradition and modern innovation. While the Box CJ is categorized as 'Clacky', 'Mild', 'Neutral', and 'Chirpy', the Nixie is categorized as 'Textured', 'Thocky', and 'Low-pitched'. Both switches have their own strengths and appeal to different preferences, however, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
63.5g
Bottom-out force
57g
Bottom-out force
80g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
15.4mm single-stage spring
Spring
Gold-plated
Housing materials
The Gateron Box CJ and the Cherry Nixie switches both feature polycarbonate top housings, which create a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile compared to switches with other housing materials. This is due to the stiffness of polycarbonate, which leads to a more clear and resonant sound when typing. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it an ideal material for switches that utilize RGB lighting. On the other hand, the Nixie switches have nylon top housings, which produce a deeper and fuller sound profile thanks to the softness of the nylon material that absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound.
While both the Box CJ and the Nixie switches feature nylon bottom housings, which contribute to a deeper and fuller sound profile, the impact of the bottom housing on the overall sound and feel of the switch is more noticeable during bottom-out actions. The softer nature of nylon absorbs more sound, creating a duller and rounder sound compared to switches with harder plastic housings. This results in a more satisfying typing experience with a deeper sound profile. However, the top housing material will play a significant role in the sound produced when releasing a key, showcasing the importance of considering both top and bottom housing materials in switch design.
In conclusion, while the Gateron Box CJ and the Cherry Nixie switches share similarities in their use of nylon bottom housings for a deeper sound profile, they differ in their top housing materials, with the Box CJ featuring a polycarbonate top housing for a sharper and crisper sound while the Nixie utilizes a nylon top housing for a deeper and fuller sound. Understanding how these materials impact sound profiles can help keyboard enthusiasts make informed decisions when selecting switches based on their desired typing experience. Ultimately, both switches offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences in sound and feel.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Gateron Box CJ linear switch and the Cherry Nixie linear switch, it is evident that the Box CJ is lighter in both aspects. The Gateron Box CJ has an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 57 grams, while the Cherry Nixie has an actuation force of 63.5 grams and a bottom out force of 80 grams. The Box CJ provides a medium-light typing experience, making it suitable for those who prefer a lighter touch for extended typing or gaming sessions. On the other hand, the Nixie offers a heavier push feel, ideal for users who enjoy a more substantial typing experience. Ultimately, depending on individual preferences, users can choose between the lighter actuation and bottom out forces of the Box CJ or the heavier forces of the Cherry Nixie to cater to their typing needs.
Travel distance
The Gateron Box CJ linear switch and the Cherry Nixie linear switch both have a travel distance of 4 mm, making them equal in this aspect. This means that when you press down on a key with either switch, you will experience a similar travel distance of 4 mm. Both switches provide a consistent and satisfying typing experience with their identical travel distance. Overall, whether you choose the Gateron Box CJ or the Cherry Nixie linear switch, you can expect to enjoy a smooth and comfortable typing experience with a 4 mm travel distance.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Gateron Box CJ has an MSRP of $6.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Box CJ for $5.35.
The Cherry Nixie has an MSRP of $6.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Nixie for $4.15.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Gateron Box CJ switch is known for its clacky nature, producing sharp and snappy sounds that are crisp, bright, and percussive. On the other hand, the Cherry Nixie switch offers a thocky experience, with deep, rich, and satisfying tones akin to a deep "thud" or soft "knock". The choice between the two will heavily depend on personal preference, with the Box CJ providing a louder and more high-pitched sound while the Nixie offers a more bass-heavy and mellow tone.
Moving on to feel, the Gateron Box CJ switch is praised for its impossibly smooth push feel that glides effortlessly, providing a mild typing experience that stands in a safe, middle-ground zone. In contrast, the Cherry Nixie switch is described as textured, possibly offering a bit of friction when pressed. This difference in feel may cater to users who have a preference for a smoother, friction-free typing experience versus those who enjoy a bit of tactile feedback.
Overall, if you are looking for a linear switch with a fast response time and clacky sound, the Gateron Box CJ would be the way to go. On the other hand, if you prefer a switch with substantial heft, textured typing experience, and thocky sound, the Cherry Nixie is the better choice. Keep in mind that the sound and feel of a switch can also be influenced by other factors such as the keyboard board and keycaps used, so it is recommended to experiment and find what works best for your personal typing preferences.
Conclusion
In conclusion, when deciding between the Gateron Box CJ linear switch and the Cherry Nixie linear switch, consider the key characteristics of each switch. If you prioritize a swift and responsive typing experience with a higher-pitched clack, smooth push feel, and the option for customization, the Gateron Box CJ may be the best choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a heavier bottom out force, a textured typing experience, and a deep, satisfying thocky sound, the Cherry Nixie could be more to your liking. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences for typing feel, sound profile, and overall typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
