Durock Anubis vs. Gateron Type S
An in-depth look at the Durock Anubis and the Gateron Type S switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Durock Anubis and the Gateron Type S stand out as excellent choices with their own unique qualities. The Anubis is a tactile switch known for its deep and resonant sound profile, offering a satisfying and assertive tactile feedback with a pronounced bump that adds intensity to every keystroke. On the other hand, the Gateron Type S is a linear switch from Sillyworks' "Project Rehash," featuring a contemporary factory lubing technique that rejuvenates classic travel distances and molds. With a weightier 65g bottom-out and a pleasingly balanced sound signature, the Type S caters to those who prefer a neutral yet deeper acoustic experience. While the Anubis excels in sharp tactility, the Type S offers a smoother typing experience with its linear design. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
55g
Bottom-out force
65g
Bottom-out force
65g
Pre-travel
N/A
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Gold-plated
Spring
18mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the Durock Anubis and the Gateron Type S are both made of nylon, which is known for creating a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to harder plastics. This is due to the softer nature of nylon, which allows it to absorb more sound and produce a duller and rounder sound. Both switches offer a similar typing experience in terms of sound quality, thanks to the nylon housing material used in both the top and bottom components.
However, where the two switches differ is in how the qualities of the housing material are distributed between the top and bottom housings. In the Anubis, the bottom housing has more impact on the bottom-out sound and feel, while the top housing affects the sound when a key is released. On the other hand, the Type S may offer a slightly different typing experience due to the way the qualities of the nylon material are divided between the top and bottom housings. This could result in subtle variations in sound and feel between the two switches.
Overall, both the Durock Anubis and the Gateron Type S provide a similar typing experience when it comes to sound quality, thanks to their nylon housing materials. The subtle differences in the distribution of these qualities between the top and bottom housings may result in slightly varied typing experiences for users who are particularly sensitive to sound and feel. However, for most users, the impact of these differences is likely to be minimal, and both switches are likely to deliver a satisfying typing experience.
Weight
The Durock Anubis tactile switch and the Gateron Type S linear switch have different actuation forces but the same bottom out force. The Anubis has no specified actuation force and a bottom out force of 65 grams, while the Type S has an actuation force of 55 grams and the same bottom out force of 65 grams. This means that the Type S is lighter in terms of actuation force compared to the Anubis. When it comes to choosing between the two based on weight preferences, the Anubis may be more suitable for those who prefer a heavier actuation force, providing a more substantial typing experience. On the other hand, the Type S's lighter actuation force may cater more to individuals who prefer a lighter touch for longer typing sessions or gaming. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on the individual's preference for actuation force and typing experience.
Travel distance
Both the Durock Anubis tactile switch and the Gateron Type S linear switch have a travel distance of 4 mm, making them equal in this aspect. When comparing and contrasting their travel distance, it is evident that both switches offer a consistent and standard distance for users to press down on. This means that regardless of whether you choose the Anubis or the Type S, you can expect a similar key feel and typing experience in terms of travel distance. As a result, you can achieve comparable results with both switches when it comes to the distance the keys travel when pressed. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches would come down to other factors such as actuation force, sound, and overall typing feel.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
For 10 switches, the Durock Anubis comes in at $8.00, whereas the Gateron Type S comes in at $4.70.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Durock Anubis tactile switch is designed to provide a deep and resonant sound profile, delivering a satisfying and assertive tactile feedback with each keystroke. This switch offers a more pronounced tactile bump, resulting in a sharper tactility that intensifies the typing experience. On the other hand, the Gateron Type S linear switch boasts a neutral sound profile with a pleasing balance, leaning towards a deeper acoustic experience. Additionally, the Type S switch produces a more subdued sound compared to most switches, offering a dampened sound when pressed. Ultimately, the sound of a switch is subjective and can be influenced by factors such as the keyboard and keycaps used.
In terms of feel, the Anubis switch is known for its accented tactile feedback, providing a medium level of tactility that is neither overwhelming nor subtle. Additionally, this switch is polished, offering a smooth and refined typing experience with reduced friction. Conversely, information on the tactile feel of the Gateron Type S switch is currently unknown. However, based on available data, it can be inferred that the Type S switch may provide a moderate actuation force requirement and a smooth key travel experience, catering to those who prefer a weightier keystroke.
Both the Durock Anubis tactile switch and the Gateron Type S linear switch offer unique characteristics in terms of sound and feel. While the Anubis switch provides a deep and resonant sound profile with a pronounced tactile bump, the Type S switch boasts a more subdued sound with a weightier keystroke. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for sound, tactility, and typing experience. However, it is worth noting that both switches are designed to cater to a wide range of users, whether they are beginners or advanced enthusiasts, looking for a satisfying and enjoyable typing experience.
Conclusion
To sum up, when considering whether to choose the Durock Anubis tactile switch or the Gateron Type S linear switch, it ultimately depends on your preferences and typing style. If you prefer a sharp and intense tactility with a deep sound profile, then the Anubis would be a great choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a weightier keystroke with a more subdued sound signature, the Gateron Type S might be more suitable. Both switches have a bottom-out force of 65 grams, making them medium-heavy switches, but the key differences lie in the tactile feedback and sound profile. Ultimately, it's important to consider how you like your typing experience to feel and sound before making a decision between these two switches.
Mentioned in this article
