Durock Anubis vs. KTT Glimp

An in-depth look at the Durock Anubis and the KTT Glimp switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

The Durock Anubis and the KTT Glimp are two popular mechanical keyboard switches with distinct characteristics. The Anubis is a tactile switch known for its deep and resonant sound profile, providing a satisfying and assertive tactile feedback with each keystroke. Its pronounced bump sets it apart from other tactile switches, adding a sharp and intense tactility to your typing experience. On the other hand, the Glimp is a linear switch that strikes a perfect balance for those seeking a substantial typing experience without overwhelming resistance. It offers a medium-light actuation force and comfortable tactile feedback, resulting in a satisfying and responsive typing feel. Additionally, the Glimp switch has a fairly clacky sound profile that adds an enjoyable auditory element to your typing sessions. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond these generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits your preferences and typing style.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

N/A

Actuation force

43g

Bottom-out force

65g

Bottom-out force

53g

Pre-travel

N/A

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Nylon

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Gold-plated

Spring

18mm spring

Housing materials

The Durock Anubis and KTT Glimp differ in terms of their housing materials. The Anubis features a nylon top housing, while the Glimp utilizes a polycarbonate top housing. The nylon top housing of the Anubis creates a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its relatively softer plastic composition, which absorbs more sound. On the other hand, the polycarbonate top housing of the Glimp produces a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is because polycarbonate is a stiffer plastic that allows for a more clear and resonant sound. If you're looking to achieve a duller and rounder sound, the Anubis with its nylon top housing would be the better choice, whereas if you prefer a more distinct and sharper sound, the Glimp with its polycarbonate top housing is the way to go.

Moving on to the bottom housings, both the Anubis and Glimp utilize nylon as their housing material. By using nylon, both switches elicit a deeper and fuller sound profile. This is attributed to the fact that nylon is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound compared to harder plastics. As a result, both switches create a duller and rounder sound when typing. Therefore, if you're solely focusing on the bottom-out sound and feel of the switch, you can expect similar results from both the Anubis and Glimp due to their identical nylon bottom housings.

It is important to note that if a switch has different top and bottom housings, the qualities brought by each housing material will have separate impacts. The bottom housing primarily affects the bottom-out sound and feel when pressing down on the switch, while the top housing influences the sound when releasing a key. Therefore, the specific combination of housing materials, like the nylon and polycarbonate in the Anubis and Glimp respectively, creates a well-rounded and nuanced typing experience that caters to different preferences.

Weight

When comparing the actuation and bottom out forces of the Durock Anubis tactile switch and the KTT Glimp linear switch, there are notable differences to consider. The Anubis has an actuation force that is unavailable in terms of grams, whereas the Glimp requires 43 grams of force to trigger a keystroke. This indicates that the Glimp has a lighter actuation force compared to the Anubis. Moving on to the bottom out force, the Anubis requires 65 grams, making it medium-heavy, while the Glimp requires 53 grams, classifying it as medium-light. This suggests that the Anubis has a heavier bottom out force compared to the Glimp.

Weight can impact the typing experience, and individuals have different preferences in this regard. Some users may prefer lighter switches to allow for longer typing sessions, which is particularly beneficial for work or extended gaming sessions. On the other hand, those seeking a more substantial typing experience may opt for switches with heavier actuation and bottom out forces.

Therefore, those who desire a lighter actuation force and a medium-light bottom out force may find the KTT Glimp linear switch more suitable. Conversely, individuals looking for a switch with a heavier actuation force and a medium-heavy bottom out force may prefer the Durock Anubis tactile switch. Each switch offers a distinct typing experience, catering to different preferences and needs.

Travel distance

Both the Durock Anubis tactile switch and the KTT Glimp linear switch have a travel distance of 4 mm, which means that they both travel the same distance from the top to the bottom. This means that when you press down on a key that is equipped with either of these switches, you can expect a similar tactile sensation and overall typing experience. While both switches offer the same travel distance, it's worth noting that the Anubis is a tactile switch while the Glimp is linear. This means that the Anubis provides a tactile bump when pressed, giving the typist a more pronounced feedback, while the Glimp offers a smoother key press without any bump. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches will depend on the individual's preference for either a tactile or linear typing experience.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The KTT Glimp has an MSRP of $3.84 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Glimp for $3.45.

The Durock Anubis comes in at $8.00 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

The Durock Anubis tactile switch is renowned for its deep and resonant sound profile, providing a satisfying and assertive tactile feedback with each keystroke. The bump is more pronounced than most other tactile switches, offering a sharp tactility that adds a new level of intensity to typing sessions. On the other hand, the KTT Glimp linear switch strikes a perfect balance for those seeking a substantial typing experience without overwhelming resistance. It provides a comfortable actuation force and satisfying tactile feedback, while its fairly clacky sound profile adds an enjoyable auditory element to typing sessions.

In terms of sound, the Anubis is described as neutral, which means it has a moderate actuation force requirement and a moderate sound profile. This makes it suitable for various purposes, whether you are a beginner or advanced user, and whether you plan to use it at home or work. The Glimp, on the other hand, is described as clacky, producing a sharp and snappy sound when pressed. This sound is crisp, bright, and percussive. It's important to note that the sound of a switch is also influenced by other factors such as the choice of keyboard board and keycaps.

When it comes to feel, the Anubis is considered accented, providing a medium tactile experience that is neither overwhelming nor subtle. It offers a prominent amount of tactility without being scratchy. Additionally, the Anubis has a polished finish, resulting in a sleek typing experience with reduced friction and smooth key travel. On the contrary, the Glimp is described as creamy, offering a smooth and buttery typing experience. This is often achieved through factory lubrication or specific materials used in the switch. Typing on the Glimp switch feels like gliding your fingers effortlessly across the keys, creating a silky sensation. The Glimp is also considered mild, providing a more gentle typing experience compared to switches with more pronounced characteristics. It stands in a safe middle-ground zone, appealing to most users.

In conclusion, the Durock Anubis tactile switch and the KTT Glimp linear switch offer distinct qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Anubis provides a deep and resonant sound profile with a sharp tactility and polished finish, while the Glimp offers a clacky sound profile and a creamy, gentle typing experience. Depending on individual preferences, both switches can deliver satisfying and responsive typing experiences. However, it's important to consider other factors such as personal typing style, keyboard board, and keycaps, as they can also influence the overall typing feel and sound. By considering these factors, users can select the switch that best suits their preferences and needs.

Conclusion

To sum up, if you prefer a keyboard switch with a more pronounced and intense tactile feedback, the Durock Anubis tactile switch would be an excellent choice for you. With a bottom out force of 65 grams, it offers a satisfying and assertive keystroke experience. Additionally, its deep and resonant sound profile adds to the overall typing sensation. On the other hand, if you prefer a medium-light switch with a substantial typing experience, the KTT Glimp linear switch would be a great option. With a bottom out force of 53 grams, it strikes the perfect balance between comfort and resistance. Its clacky sound profile also adds an enjoyable auditory element to your typing sessions. Ultimately, the choice between the Anubis and Glimp switches comes down to personal preference in terms of tactile feedback and sound profile.

Mentioned in this article